腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术治疗胆囊并胆总管结石的效果分析

檀占海; 朱光辉; 陈建荣; 周联明; 杨治; 张吉发; 张学利; 单远洲

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.05.018

腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术治疗胆囊并胆总管结石的效果分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.05.018

上海市奉贤区中心医院普外科

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.42
计量
- 文章访问数: 3053
- HTML全文浏览量: 31
- PDF下载量: 472
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 出版日期: 2017-05-20

Clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage in treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones

Department of General Surgery, The Central Hospital of Fengxian District

摘要

摘要:
目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术（LC+LCHTD）在胆囊合并胆总管结石治疗中的应用效果。方法回顾性研究2013年1月-2016年1月在上海市奉贤区中心医院行手术治疗的胆囊合并胆总管结石患者共117例,其中行LC+LCHTD（LC+LCHTD组）57例,同期行传统开放胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术（OC+OCHTD组）的患者60例。比较2组患者的手术时间、手术出血量、住院时间、住院费用和术后并发症发生情况,以及2组患者的术后相关生化指标的变化。不同时间点的测量值采用重复测量的方差分析,2组间比较采用t检验,计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验。结果 LC+LCHTD组和OC+OCHTD组的手术时间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;LC+LCHTD组患者的术中出血量、术后禁食水时间和术后住院时间均明显低于OC+LCHTD组（t值分别为11.765、2.978、5.876,P值均<0.05）;LC+LCHTD组的术后24 h、3 d、7 d的疼痛VAS评分均显著低于OC+OCHTD组（t值分别为2.403、3.205、2.032,P值均...
- 胆总管结石 /
- 胆囊切除术,腹腔镜 /
- 胆道镜 /
- 外科手术,微创性 /
- 治疗
Abstract:
Objectives To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with laparoscopic choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage (LCHTD) in the treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 117 patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones who underwent surgical treatment in The Central Hospital of Fengxian District from January 2013 to January 2016, and among these patients, 57 underwent LC + LCHTD (LC + LCHTD group) and 60 underwent open cholecystectomy (OC) combined with open choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage (OCHTD) (OC + OCHTD group) .The time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, hospital costs, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups, as well as the changes in related biochemical parameters after surgery.A repeated measures analysis of variance was used for comparison of values measured at different time points, the t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.Results There was no significant difference in the time of operation between the LC + LCHTD group and the OC + OCHTD group (P>0.05) .Compared with the OC + OCHTD group, the LC +LCHTD group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, postoperative fasting time, and length of postoperative hospital stay (t=11.765, 2.978, and 5.876, all P<0.05) , a significantly lower visual analogue scale pain score at 24 hours and 3 and 7 days after surgery (t=2.403, 3.205, and 2.032, all P<0.05) , and significantly higher total hospital costs (t=5.664, P<0.001) .The LC + LCHTD group had a significantly lower incidence rate of total complications than the OC + OCHTD group (χ2=4.173, P<0.05) , and the OC +OCHTD group had a significantly greater reduction in albumin than the LC + LCHTD group (t=10.766, P<0.05) .Conclusion In the treatment gallbladder and common bile duct stones, the patients treated with LC + LCHTD have less surgical trauma and postoperative complications, a shorter length of hospital stay, and faster postoperative rehabilitation, compared with those treated with OC + OCHTD.
- choledocholithiasis /
- cholecystectomy, laparoscopic /
- choledochoscopy /
- surgical procedures, minimally invasive /
- therapy

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1]AKHTAR AJ, AKHTAR AA, PADDA MS.Choledocholithiasis in African American and Hispanic patients:a comparison between painless presentation and classical biliary pain with regards to clinical manifestations and outcomes[J].J Immigr Minor Health, 2014, 16 (3) :373-376.

[2]OZKARDES AB, TOKAC M, DUMLU EG, et al.Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis:a prospective, randomized study[J].Int Surg, 2014, 99 (1) :56-61.

[3]ZHANG ZY, DU LX, ZHENG W, et al.Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Gen Surg, 2015, 24 (8) :1088-1092. (in Chinese) 张智勇, 杜立学, 郑伟, 等.腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗胆总管结石的临床对照研究[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24 (8) :1088-1092.

[4]YANG DY.Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with gallbladder disease and concomitant choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Gen Surg, 2015, 24 (8) :1093-1096. (in Chinese) 杨德盈.老年腹腔镜胆囊切除胆总管探查取石术的临床疗效分析[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24 (8) :1093-1096.

[5]Edirorial Board of Chinese Journal of Digestion.Chinese consensus on the medical diagnosis and treatment of chronic cholecystitis and gallstones (2014, Shanghai) [J].J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (1) :7-11. (in Chinese) 中华消化杂志编辑委员会.中国慢性胆囊炎、胆囊结石内科诊疗共识意见 (2014年, 上海) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (1) :7-11.

[6]YASUDA I, FUJITA N, MAGUCHI H, et al.Long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72 (6) :1185-1191.

[7]PAN Z, CHENG ZJ, LIU SL, et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Gen Surg, 2015, 24 (8) :1135-1139. (in Chinese) 潘峥, 程张军, 刘胜利, 等.胆总管结石腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管引流的临床比较[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24 (8) :1135-1139.

[8]DUNCAN CB, RIALL TS.Evidence-based current surgical practice:calculous gallbladder disease[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16 (11) :2011-2025.

[9]ZHANG ZM, YUAN HM, ZHANG C.Strategy of laparoscopy and choledochoscopy or duodenoscopy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis[J].Chin J Digest Surg, 2015, 14 (4) :280-283. (in Chinese) 张宗明, 苑海明, 张羽中.双镜联合同期治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的策略[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2015, 14 (4) :280-283.

[10]YIN FF, SUN SB.Minimally invasive treatment of concomitant extraand intrahepatic bile duct stones:current status and progress[J].Chin J General Surgery, 2014, 23 (8) :1117-1120. (in Chinese) 尹飞飞, 孙世波.肝外伴肝内胆管结石的微创治疗现状与进展[J].中国普通外科杂志, 2014, 23 (8) :1117-1120.

[11]SHELAT VG, CHAN CY, LIAU KH, et al.Laparoscopic exploration can salvage failed endoscopic bile duct stone extraction[J].Singapore Med J, 2012, 53 (5) :313-317.

[12]KHALED YS, MALDE DJ, de SOUZA C, et al.Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis[J].Surg Endosc, 2013, 27 (11) :4164-4170.

[13]ZHANG HW, CHEN YJ, WU CH, et al.Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis:a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage[J].Am Surg, 2014, 80 (2) :178-181.

[14]WANG DH, DAI YZ.Gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy by laparoscopy and cholangioscopy for cholecystolithiasis[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (4) :758-760. (in Chinese) 汪大海, 戴永泽.腹腔镜联合胆道镜行保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的体会[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (4) :758-760.

[15]BAZOUA G, TILSTON MP.Male gender impact on the outcome o laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].JSLS, 2014, 18 (1) :50-54.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计