中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

Value of early admission scoring systems in predicting the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.06.030
Research funding:

 

  • Published Date: 2020-06-20
  • Objective To screen out the scoring system with the highest predictive value by analyzing the comprehensive scoring systems which can assess the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis in the early stage( within 24 hours) after admission. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 254 patients with acute pancreatitis who were admitted to Department of Gastroenterology,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,from September 2016 to September 2019,and they were divided into mild acute pancreatitis( MAP) group,moderate-severe acute pancreatitis( MSAP) group,and severe acute pancreatitis( SAP) group.The three groups were compared in terms of general data,comorbidities,and scores of early admission scoring systems,including BISAP score,SIRS score,MEWS score,PANC3 score,HAPS score,CTSI score,and SPS score,and these scoring systems were compared in terms of their value in predicting the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. An analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups; the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. The receiver operating characteristic( ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the ROC curve( AUC) was compared. Results The SAP group had a significantly longer length of hospital stay and significantly higher hospital costs than the other two groups( H = 48. 82 and 76. 93,both P<0. 05). As for comorbidities,there were significant differences in the presence or absence of pulmonary infection,pancreatic necrosis,multiple organ dysfunction syndrome( MODS),and death between the three groups( H = 64. 84,98. 19,53. 09,and 8. 09,all P < 0. 05). As for the early scoring systems,there were significant differences between the three groups in BISAP score,SIRS score,MEWS score,HAPS score,CTSI score,and SPS score( H = 93. 19,21. 24,23. 99,16. 57,67. 09,and 33. 95,all P < 0. 05). The early scoring systems were further compared in terms of the severity of pancreatitis and complications based on the ROC curve,and it was found that BISAP score had the highest value in predicting SAP and pulmonary infection within 24 hours after admission,with sensitivities of 86. 10% and 51. 20%,respectively,and specificities of 81. 70% and 83. 50%,respectively,at the cut-off value of >2. CTSI score had the highest value in predicting pancreatic necrosis,with a sensitivity of 82. 70% and a specificity of 89. 10% at the cut-off value of > 3. In terms of MODS,both HAPS and BISAP scores had good predictive value,with sensitivities of 63. 70% and 75. 00%,respectively,and specificities of 90. 00%and 76. 10%,respectively. Conclusion Different scoring systems have their own advantages in predicting the severity and complications of pancreatitis in the early stage,among which BISAP score has a high value in predicting SAP,pancreatitis with pulmonary infection,and MODS,CTSI score has a high value in predicting pancreatic necrosis,and HAPS score has a high value in excluding MODS in the early stage.

     

  • [1] FORSMARK CE,BAILLIE J,AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee,et al. AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterology,2007,132(5):2022-2044.
    [2] PAPACHRISTOU GI,CLERMONT G,SHARMA A,et al. Risk and markers of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterol Clin North Am,2007,36(2):277-296.
    [3] WU BU,BANKS PA. Clinical management of patients with acute pancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterology,2013,144(6):1272-1281.
    [4] BANKS PA,BOLLEN TL,DERVENIS C,et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012:Revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus[J]. Gut,2013,62(1):102-111.
    [5] LU JH,NIU YY,ZHANG Y,et al. Application value of MEWS scoring assessment system in severe acute pancreatitis patients[J]. China Med Herald,2018,15(16):162-165.(in Chinese)卢俊红,牛玉英,张颖,等.早期预警评分在急诊科急性胰腺炎患者护理中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(16):162-165.
    [6] LENG F,YANG L,CHANG ZG,et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012:International consensus on classification and definition revision of Atlanta[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2013,29(4):322-328.(in Chinese)冷芳,杨力,常志刚,等.急性胰腺炎分类———2012:亚特兰大分类和定义修订的国际共识[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2013,29(4):322-328.
    [7] Pancreas Study Group,Chinese Society of Gastroenterology,Chinese Medical Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Pancreatology; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Digestion. Chinese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis(Shenyang,2019)[J]. J Clin Hepatol,2019,35(12):2706-2711.(in Chinese)中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组,《中华胰腺病杂志》编委会,《中华消化杂志》编委会.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2019年,沈阳)[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2019,35(12):2706-2711.
    [8] XIAN LN,YANG YZ,CHEN W,et al. The application value of chemokine MIP-1α,MIP-1βand APACHEⅡscore in the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis[J]. Trauma and Crit Medicine,2018,6(1):14-17.(in Chinese)冼丽娜,杨远征,陈伟,等.巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1α、巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1β与急性生理和慢性健康状况评分在急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后中应用价值[J].创伤与急危重病医学,2018,6(1):14-17.
    [9] BROWN A,JAMES-STEVENSON T,DYSON T,et al. The panc 3 score:A rapid and accurate test for predicting severity on presentation in acute pancreatitis[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol,2007,41(9):855-858.
    [10] TSUJI Y,TAKAHASHI N,TSUTOMU C. Pancreatic perfusion CT in early stage of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Int J Inflam,2012:497386.
    [11] WU BU,JOHANNES RS,SUN X,et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis:A large population-based study[J]. Gut,2008,57(12):1698-1703.
    [12] GAO W,YANG HX,MA CE. The value of BISAP score for predicting mortality and severity in acute pancreatitis:A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. PLo S One,2015,10(6):e0130412.
    [13] WANG AJ,XU S,HONG JB,et al. The comparison of different clinical scoring systems for predicting prognosis in acute pancreatitis based on the revised Atlanta classification[J].Chin J Intern Med,2013,52(8):668-671.(in Chinese)汪安江,徐思,洪军波,等.新亚特兰大分类下不同评分标准预测急性胰腺炎预后的价值比较[J].中华内科杂志,2013,52(8):668-671.
    [14] WANG Y,ATTAR BM. Comment on“Comparison of BISAP,Ranson,MCTSI,and APACHE II in Predicting Severity and Prognoses of Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis in Chinese Patients”[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract,2017,2017:1426486.
    [15] ZHENG JM,GAO JC,ZHAO HW,et al. Comparison of four scoring systems in the evaluation of prognosis of acute pancreatitis[J]. Tianjin Med J,2015,43(2):217-220.(in Chinese)郑吉敏,高俊茶,赵红伟,等.四种评分系统对急性胰腺炎预后评估价值的比较[J].天津医药,2015,43(2):217-220.
    [16] HARSHIT KUMAR A,SINGH GRIWAN M. A comparison of APACHE II,BISAP,Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification[J]. Gastroenterol Rep(Oxf),2018,6(2):127-131.
    [17] BALTHAZAR EJ,RANSON JH,NAIDICH DP,et al. Acute pancreatitis:Prognostic value of CT[J]. Radiology,1985,156(3):767-772.
    [18] Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis[J]. Pancreatology,2013,13(4 Suppl 2):e1-e15.
    [19] HE WH,ZHU Y,ZHU Y,et al. Comparison of multifactor scoring systems and single serum markers for the early prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2017,32(11):1895-1901.
    [20] LANKISCH PG,WEBER-DANY B,HEBEL K,et al. The harmless acute pancreatitis score:A clinical algorithm for rapid initial stratification of nonsevere disease[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2009,7(6):702-705; quiz 607.
    [21] ZHANG YY,HUANG H,LU ML,et al. Comparative study of different scoring systems on the judgment of the condition and prognosis of acute pancreatitis[J]. Chin J Gastroenter Hepatol,2018,27(1):25-29.(in Chinese)张映媛,黄华,路明亮,等.不同评分系统对判断急性胰腺炎病情及预后的比较研究[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2018,27(1):25-29.
    [22] KUO DC,RIDER AC,ESTRADA P,et al. Acute pancreatitis:What's the score?[J]. J Emerg Med,2015,48(6):762-770.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Rongjie LI, Yi PENG, Xiaolong TANG, Decai ZHANG, Shaojun LIU. Establishment of a modified BISAP scoring system and its clinical significance in the early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2023, 39(10): 2432-2442. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.10.022
    [2]Faquan ZHOU, Shi CHEN, Hongyu SUN, Lijun TANG. Correlation of systemic immune-inflammation index and pancreatic cancer prognosis, recent research progress[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(11): 2669-2672. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.11.046
    [3]Qiu JIN, Jing YANG, Honglin MA, Pingju LI, Shaoshan HU, Qingqing LIU. Research advances in the value of related markers in predicting the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(12): 2877-2881. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.12.038
    [4]Xiuping LUO, Jie WANG, Qing WU, Mengbin QIN, Shiquan LIU, Jiean HUANG. Research advances in acute pancreatitis scoring system[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(9): 2188-2192. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.09.046
    [5]Qiu JIN, Jing YANG, Honglin MA, Pingju LI, Shaoshan HU, Qingqing LIU. Value of different scoring systems in predicting the severity and prognosis of hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2022, 38(11): 2551-2557. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.11.022
    [6]Yuqing CHEN, Peiling LI, Lu ZHANG, Huan XU, Yan PENG, Xiaowei TANG. Clinical and prognostic features of hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis during pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(5): 1164-1168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.05.036
    [7]Haoyou TANG, Sheng LIU, Chengjun HU, Lin MA, Jianshui LI. Value of modified objective Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis score in predicting the severity and prognosis of acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2021, 37(6): 1386-1391. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.06.032
    [8]Zhong Rui, Yan YongFeng, Jiang Xin, Xu Huan, Peng Yan, Wang Min, Fu WenGuang, Tang XiaoWei. Clinical features of acute pancreatitis with metabolic syndrome and influencing factors for prognosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(8): 1794-1798. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.08.023
    [9]Yan YongFeng, Jiang Xin, Zhong Rui, Xu Huan, Peng Yan, Tang XiaoWei. Clinical features and prognosis of acute pancreatitis with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(5): 1091-1096. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.05.028
    [10]JIANG Xin, YAN YongFeng, ZHONG Rui, XU Huan, PENG Yan, TANG XiaoWei. Influence of serum triglyceride level on the prognosis of acute biliary pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(11): 2509-2514. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.11.022
    [11]Zhang WenJia, Zhao LiJuan, Wu JiZhou. Value of MELD、AARC、COSSH ccoring systems in evaluating the 90-day prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2020, 36(4): 813-817. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.04.021
    [12]Yao YunHai, Gan JianHe, Zhao WeiFeng. Value of four scoring systems in evaluating the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with infection[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2019, 35(1): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.016
    [13]Yuan Jing, Meng Fei, Tang XiaoWei, Chen Xia, Peng Yan. Clinical features and prognosis of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2019, 35(1): 138-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.026
    [14]Zhong Rui, Xu Huan, Peng Yan, Yan YongFeng, Jiang Xin, Wang Min, Fu WenGuang, Tang XiaoWei. Clinical and prognostic features of children with acute pancreatitis:A retrospective analysis of 105 cases[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2019, 35(10): 2240-2245. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.10.022
    [15]Wang XiaoFang, Zhu LiYing, Lu BaoLing, Zhong LiHua, Cheng Yu, Fan Jian, Yao Hong, Yu Lei. Application of different scoring systems in evaluating prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization for primary liver cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(10): 2016-2020. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.10.036
    [16]Gao Fan, Qi XingShun, Hou Yue, Guo XiaoZhong. Association between pancreatitis and fatty liver disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2017, 33(1): 40-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.01.008
    [17]Chen DongLai, Liao ZhenHai, Lin ShunQuan. Diagnostic value of serum lipase combined with Ranson or BISAP scoring system in assessment of severity of acute pancreatitis[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2016, 32(2): 324-328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.02.026
    [18]Liu Huan, Song LiWen, Cao WuKui, Li Fei. The predictive values of four scoring systems in short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2015, 31(9): 1418-1421. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2015.09.013
    [19]Li XinYan, Huang ShuLin, Fang Liang, Lei RuiXiang, Ke WeiMin. A simple scoring system for evaluating severity of HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2014, 30(10): 996-999. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.10.006
    [20]Guo ZiHao, Hao JianYu. Review of acute pancreatitis scoring systems[J]. Journal of Clinical Hepatology, 2011, 27(11): 1170-1173.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 张双红,廖玉萍,段亚群,万盛华,许增华,刘云,吴蔚,肖珍君. DeBanto评分系统对儿童急性胰腺炎严重程度的预测价值. 江西医药. 2024(01): 78-82 .
    2. 沈增超,杨上文,潘俊娣. HAPS联合血清CaMKⅡ对急性胰腺炎患者病情严重程度及预后的预测价值. 国际消化病杂志. 2024(02): 133-137 .
    3. 张小双,周登川. POP评分联合D-二聚体及前白蛋白对急性胰腺炎严重程度评估价值的研究. 肝胆外科杂志. 2023(03): 188-192 .
    4. 崔娜,傅杰. MEWS评分护理模式在急性胰腺炎患者中的应用. 国际护理学杂志. 2023(19): 3532-3536 .
    5. 张晴,张燕,王宁. 血清AMY-P3、TryR联合检测应用于急性胰腺炎早期诊断的意义. 分子诊断与治疗杂志. 2023(11): 1948-1951+1960 .
    6. 刘玉霞,姚金磊,郭芸,孙绍军,魏秀春. CT评价系统联合血浆D-二聚体在重症急性胰腺炎预后评估中的作用. 医学影像学杂志. 2022(05): 806-811 .
    7. 范海云,陈基明,陈亮亮,吴敬医,吴莉莉,周慧. 基于胰腺周围脂肪间隙CT影像组学预测早期急性胰腺炎进展的价值. 放射学实践. 2022(06): 683-689 .
    8. 范海云,陈基明,陈亮亮,吴莉莉,周慧. CT影像组学预测早期急性胰腺炎进展的价值. 中华放射学杂志. 2022(07): 778-784 .
    9. 金秋,杨婧,马红琳,李苹菊,胡绍山,刘清清. 不同评分系统预测高脂血症性急性胰腺炎严重程度及预后的价值分析. 临床肝胆病杂志. 2022(11): 2551-2557 . 本站查看
    10. 何宇敏,赵燊,王晓萍,邵菲,唐子人. 预测重症急性胰腺炎预后模型的构建和验证. 岭南急诊医学杂志. 2021(02): 140-143 .
    11. 刘胜,唐豪佑,胡程郡,马林,李建水. 早期评分系统联合CRP对急性胰腺炎合并肺部感染早期诊断及预后的预测价值. 中国普外基础与临床杂志. 2021(06): 737-742 .
    12. 唐豪佑,刘胜,胡程俊,马林,李建水. 新血液生化评分系统对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡的预测价值. 中国普外基础与临床杂志. 2021(08): 1039-1044 .
    13. 孙青玲,王喜英,张继伟. 基于MEWS评分的护理干预在急性胰腺炎患者中的应用. 中华现代护理杂志. 2021(30): 4162-4165 .
    14. 徐光齐,蒋洪波. 埃索美拉唑联合血必净对急性胰腺炎患者胃肠功能恢复的影响. 中国医学创新. 2020(32): 126-129 .
    15. 金雨舟,马娜. 尿素氮联合肥胖相关状态模型评估急性胰腺炎预后的价值. 实用临床医药杂志. 2020(23): 102-105 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1149) PDF downloads(193) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return