中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 42 Issue 7
Jul.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Diagnostic value of cytokines combined with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score in predicting hepatic encephalopathy in end-stage liver disease

DOI: 10.12449/JCH260721
Research funding:

Kunming Science and Technology Plan Project (2024-1-NS-0035)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Liu Chunyun, 751440760@qq.com (ORCID: 0000-0001-5343-5305)
  • Received Date: 2026-01-20
  • Accepted Date: 2026-02-14
  • Published Date: 2026-07-25
  •   Objective  To construct and validate a predictive model for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) by combining key indicators such as cytokines and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and to provide evidence-based support for the early identification of high-risk populations and the optimization of intervention strategies in clinical practice.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for 2 167 patients with ESLD who were admitted to The Third People’s Hospital of Kunming from January 2022 to December 2024, the patients were divided into a training set with 1 517 patients and a validation set with 650 patients at a ratio of 7∶3 using the stratified random sampling method. A univariate analysis and a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were performed for the training set to identify potential influencing variables, and then a binary Logistic regression model was constructed to investigate the independent influencing factors for HE in ESLD patients. A nomogram prediction model was established based on this regression model, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was performed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curve were used to comprehensively evaluate the degree of fit, accuracy, consistency, and clinical practicability of the predictive model derived from the training set. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed quantitative data between two groups. The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups.  Results  The univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the study group and the control group in age, sex, blood ammonia, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, international normalized ratio, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, total protein, albumin, prealbumin, alkaline phosphatase, cholinesterase, total bile acid, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, blood glucose, CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, carcinoembryonic antigen, triiodothyronine, thyroxine, free triiodothyronine, free thyroxine, interleukin-1β, interleukin-5, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-12p70, interleukin-17, interferon-γ, and MELD score (all P<0.05). The LASSO regression analysis identified nine variables of age, blood ammonia, albumin, prealbumin, cholinesterase, total cholesterol, thyroxine, interleukin-17, and MELD score, and the binary Logistic regression analysis showed that blood ammonia, interleukin-17, and MELD score were independent risk factors for HE in ESLD patients, while age and thyroxine were independent protective factors (all P<0.05). A nomogram model was constructed based on these five variables. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test in the training set showed a good degree of fit (P=0.207), with a McFadden’s pseudo-R2 of 0.184, suggesting that the model had acceptable explanatory power; the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test in the internal validation set further confirmed the calibration stability of the model (P=0.067), suggesting that the model had a good degree of fit in independent data. The model had an area under the ROC curve of 0.784 in the validation set, with a sensitivity of 0.710 and a specificity of 0.752. The mean absolute error of the calibration curve was 0.067, and decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve showed that the nomogram model had positive net benefit and good clinical practicability.  Conclusion  The nomogram model constructed based on age, blood ammonia, thyroxine, interleukin-17, and MELD score for predicting HE in patients with ESLD has a good degree of fit, high accuracy and consistency, and excellent clinical practicability.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Chen T, Chen G, Wang G Q, et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of end-stage liver disease complicated by infections[J]. Hepatol Int, 2024, 18( 3): 817- 832. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10637-3.
    [2]
    Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver[J]. Hepatology, 2014, 60( 2): 715- 735. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27210.
    [3]
    Romero-gómez M, Boza F, García-valdecasas M S, et al. Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy predicts the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001, 96( 9): 2718- 2723. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.04130.x.
    [4]
    Ridola L, Cardinale V, Riggio O. The burden of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: From diagnosis to therapeutic strategies[J]. Ann Gastroenterol, 2018, 31( 2): 151- 164. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2018.0232.
    [5]
    Ridola L, Nardelli S, Gioia S, et al. Quality of life in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24( 48): 5446- 5453. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i48.5446.
    [6]
    Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of end-stage liver disease complicated with infections(2021 version)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 2): 304- 310. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.010.

    中华医学会感染病学分会. 终末期肝病合并感染诊治专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 2): 304- 310. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.010.
    [7]
    Chen Tao, Ning Qin. Highlights of diagnosis and treatment for end stage of liver disease with infection[J]. Chin J Clin Infect Dis, 2017, 10( 5): 389- 393. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2017.05.014.

    陈韬, 宁琴. 终末期肝病合并感染诊治的热点与难点[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2017, 10( 5): 389- 393. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2017.05.014.
    [8]
    Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure(2018)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35( 1): 38- 44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007.

    中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组, 中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2018年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35( 1): 38- 44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007.
    [9]
    Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guidelines on the management of liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35( 11): 2408- 2425. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.11.006.

    中华医学会肝病学分会. 肝硬化诊治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35( 11): 2408- 2425. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.11.006.
    [10]
    Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer(2022 edition)[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2022, 21( 2): 143- 168. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220124-00053.

    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21( 2): 143- 168. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20220124-00053.
    [11]
    Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2018, 34( 10): 2076- 2089. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.10.007.

    中华医学会肝病学分会. 肝硬化肝性脑病诊疗指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34( 10): 2076- 2089. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.10.007.
    [12]
    Liu Huimin, Huang Yuan. Recommendations for EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy(2022)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 9): 1997- 1998. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.09.010.

    刘慧敏, 黄缘.《2022年欧洲肝病学会肝性脑病管理临床实践指南》推荐意见[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 9): 1997- 1998. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.09.010.
    [13]
    Li N. Research progress in hepatic encephalopathy in recent 10 years: A Web of Science-based literature analysis[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2012, 7( 34): 2727- 2733. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.34.011.
    [14]
    Wijdicks E F M. Hepatic encephalopathy[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375( 17): 1660- 1670. DOI: 10.1056/nejmra1600561.
    [15]
    Hu Xiangdang, Ba Xiaotong, Zhu Ping. Risk factors and prognosis analysis of secondary hepatic encephalopathy in decompensated liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Exp Med, 2024, 23( 1): 9- 12. DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.01.003.

    胡向党, 巴晓彤, 朱萍. 肝硬化失代偿期继发肝性脑病的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23( 1): 9- 12. DOI: 10. 3969/ j. issn. 1671- 4695. 2024. 01. 003.
    [16]
    Betrapally N S, Gillevet P M, Bajaj J S. Gut microbiome and liver disease[J]. Transl Res, 2017, 179: 49- 59. DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.07.005.
    [17]
    Gao Xiaoqin, Zhou Dan, Wang Shan, et al. Role of microbiota-gut-liver-brain axis on liver cirrhosis-associated neuropsychiatric diseases[J/CD]. Chin J Liver Dis(Electronic Version), 2025, 17( 3): 28- 33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2025.03.004.

    高晓琴, 周丹, 王珊, 等. 肠道微生物群-肠-肝-脑轴在肝硬化相关神经精神疾病中的作用[J/CD]. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版), 2025, 17( 3): 28- 33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7380.2025.03.004.
    [18]
    Yang Zhihui, Chen Meijuan, Zhang Mengxiao, et al. Research progress of multi-dimensional liver function evaluation in predicting liver cirrhosis compensation[J]. Clin J Med Offic, 2026, 54( 2): 111- 114, 120.

    杨志慧, 陈美娟, 张濛销, 等. 多维度肝功能评估预测肝硬化再代偿研究进展[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2026, 54( 2): 111- 114, 120.
    [19]
    Odeh M, Sabo E, Srugo I, et al. Relationship between tumor necrosis factor-alpha and ammonia in patients with hepatic encephalopathy due to chronic liver failure[J]. Ann Med, 2005, 37( 8): 603- 612. DOI: 10.1080/07853890500317414.
    [20]
    Yang Xuhong, Yang Yong, Wang Minglei, et al. Value of blood ammonia and cholinesterase in the early diagnosis of liver cirrhosis with minimal hepatic encephalopathy[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2023, 39( 2): 339- 344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.02.013.

    杨旭宏, 杨勇, 王明磊, 等. 血氨及胆碱酯酶对肝硬化伴轻微肝性脑病的早期诊断价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39( 2): 339- 344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.02.013.
    [21]
    Le Yingyu, Zhang Rongzhen, Xiao Weisong, et al. Research progress on pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy[J]. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med Liver Dis, 2022, 32( 5): 468- 472. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0264.2022.05.023.

    乐滢玉, 张荣臻, 肖伟松, 等. 肝性脑病发病机制的研究进展[J]. 中西医结合肝病杂志, 2022, 32( 5): 468- 472. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0264.2022.05.023.
    [22]
    Odeh M. Pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy: The tumour necrosis factor-alpha theory[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2007, 37( 4): 291- 304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01778.x.
    [23]
    Tranah T H, Vijay G K M, Ryan J M, et al. Systemic inflammation and ammonia in hepatic encephalopathy[J]. Metab Brain Dis, 2013, 28( 1): 1- 5. DOI: 10.1007/s11011-012-9370-2.
    [24]
    Arenas Y M, Montoliu C, Llansola M, et al. A transient blood IL-17 increase triggers neuroinflammation in cerebellum and motor incoordination in hyperammonemic rats[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2024, 21( 1): 314. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-024-03310-5.
    [25]
    Sun X M, Lv Y, Huang L, et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines serve as communicating molecules between the liver and brain for hepatic encephalopathy pathogenesis and Lycium barbarum polysaccharides protection[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2020, 248: 112357. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112357.
    [26]
    Li J Q, Liang X, You S L, et al. Development and validation of a new prognostic score for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Hepatol, 2021, 75( 5): 1104- 1115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.026.
    [27]
    Zhang Yuan, Wu Chengyun, Chen Bo, et al. Comparison of therapeutic effects of different artificial liver models on chronic and acute liver failure associated with hepatitis B virus[J]. Chin J Integr Tradit West Nephrol, 2021, 22( 5): 451- 453. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-587X.2021.05.024.

    张育安, 吴成云, 陈波, 等. 不同人工肝模式治疗乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭的疗效比较[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2021, 22( 5): 451- 453. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-587X.2021.05.024.
    [28]
    Liu Changjiang, Wang Li, Zhang Liyuan, et al. Analysis the model for end-stage liver disease of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Chin J Postgrad Med, 2014, 37( 22): 45- 47. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2014.22.014.

    刘昌江, 王莉, 张丽媛, 等. 肝硬化患者肝性脑病的发生率与终末期肝病模型评分分析[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2014, 37( 22): 45- 47. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2014.22.014.
    [29]
    Guo Xiuli, Zhao Hui, Liang Pixia, et al. Clinical significance of the level of serum thyroxin in type-C HE patients[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2011, 27( 10): 1077- 1080. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2011.10.018.

    郭秀丽, 赵晖, 梁丕霞, 等. 血清甲状腺素水平对C型肝性脑病评估的临床意义[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2011, 27( 10): 1077- 1080. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2011.10.018.
    [30]
    Bajaj J S, Tandon P, O’leary J G, et al. Admission serum metabolites and thyroxine predict advanced hepatic encephalopathy in a multicenter inpatient cirrhosis cohort[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 21( 4): 1031- 1040. e 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.03.046.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (73) PDF downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return