中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 40 Issue 5
May  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Liver biopsy and clinical features of liver injury of unknown origin: An analysis of 94 cases

DOI: 10.12449/JCH240520
Research funding:

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2021J05278)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHOU Jingping, jingping714@sina.com (ORCID: 0000-0002-3703-2204)
  • Received Date: 2023-07-30
  • Accepted Date: 2023-09-08
  • Published Date: 2024-05-25
  •   Objective  To summarize the liver biopsy and clinical features of patients with liver injury of unknown origin, and to investigate the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in the diagnosis of liver injury of unknown origin.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data and ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy results of 94 patients with liver injury of unknown origin who were admitted to Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, from January 2018 to February 2023. According to the proportion of the patients with different final diagnoses, the patients were divided into autoimmune liver disease (AILD) group, metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) group, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) group, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) group, and unknown group. An analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups, and the Bonferroni analysis or the Dunnett’ T3 test was used for further comparison between two groups; the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups; the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between multiple groups.  Results  All 94 patients with liver injury of unknown origin underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy after admission, among whom 90 patients (95.7%) had a confirmed diagnosis based on liver biopsy and clinical features. There were 43 patients (45.7%) with AILD, 21 (22.3%) with MAFLD, 15 (16.0%) with DILI, 6 (6.4%) with ALD, 1 (1.1%) with AILD and MAFLD, 1 (1.1%) with hemochromatosis, 1 (1.1%) with Budd-Chiari syndrome, 1 (1.1%) with congenital hepatic fibrosis, and 1 (1.1%) with idiopathic portal hypertension, while 4 patients (4.3%) still had an unknown etiology after liver biopsy. There were significant differences between the patients with top five diagnoses in age (F=4.457, P<0.05) , body mass index (BMI) (F=3.245, P<0.05), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (H=11.128, P<0.05), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) (H=24.789, P<0.05), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (H=26.013, P<0.05), IgG (H=19.099, P<0.05), IgM (H=21.263, P<0.05), AMA-M2 positive rate (P<0.05), and ANA positive rate (P<0.05). Compared with the MAFLD group, the AILD group had significantly higher age, AST, GGT, and ALP and a significantly lower BMI; compared with the MAFLD group and the DILI group, the AILD group had significant increases in IgG and IgM; the AILD group had significant increases in the positive rates of AMA-M2 and ANA compared with the other four groups.  Conclusion  AILD, MAFLD, and DILI are the most common causes in patients with liver injury of unknown origin. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy plays an important role in determining the cause of liver injury of unknown origin, but it is still needed to make a comprehensive analysis based on clinical history, different types of liver injury, laboratory markers, and imaging data.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BÉNICHOU C. Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders. Report of an international consensus meeting[J]. J Hepatol, 1990, 11( 2): 272- 276. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-a.
    [2]
    HALDAR D, JANMOHAMED A, PLANT T, et al. Antibodies to gp210 and understanding risk in patients with primary biliary cholangitis[J]. Liver Int, 2021, 41( 3): 535- 544. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14688.
    [3]
    YAN HP, ZHANG HP, CHEN XX. How to understand the clinical significance of autoantibodies in primary biliary cholangitis[J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2017, 25( 11): 810- 813. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2017.11.003.

    闫惠平, 张海萍, 陈欣欣. 如何认识原发性胆汁性胆管炎自身抗体的临床意义[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2017, 25( 11): 810- 813. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2017.11.003.
    [4]
    MA L, GAO LL, DUAN XF. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with primary biliary cholangitis-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome[J]. J Pract Hepatol, 2023, 26( 2): 301- 304. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2023.02.038.

    马莉, 高丽丽, 段雪飞. 原发性胆汁性胆管炎-自身免疫性肝炎重叠综合征诊治进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26( 2): 301- 304. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2023.02.038.
    [5]
    YE Q, ZOU BY, YEO YH, et al. Global prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of non-obese or lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5( 8): 739- 752. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30077-7.
    [6]
    ESLAM M, NEWSOME PN, SARIN SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73( 1): 202- 209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039.
    [7]
    XUE R, FAN JG. Brief introduction of an international expert consensus statement: A new definition of metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. J Pract Hepatol, 2020, 23( 3): 457- 460. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2020.03.039.

    薛芮, 范建高. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病新定义的国际专家共识简介[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2020, 23( 3): 457- 460. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2020.03.039.
    [8]
    CAI LY, WANG WJ, LIANG YX, et al. Research progress in the relationship between metabolic associated fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome[J]. Chin J N Clin Med, 2021, 14( 7): 730- 734. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2021.07.22.

    蔡联英, 王文娟, 梁运啸, 等. 代谢相关脂肪性肝病与代谢综合征相关性的研究进展[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2021, 14( 7): 730- 734. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2021.07.22.
    [9]
    SHEN T, HUANG X, WANG YY, et al. Current status of epidemiological studies on drug-induced liver injury in China[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2018, 34( 6): 1152- 1155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.06.002.

    沈弢, 黄昕, 王誉雅, 等. 我国药物性肝损伤流行病学研究现状[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2018, 34( 6): 1152- 1155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2018.06.002.
    [10]
    CHALASANI N, BONKOVSKY HL, FONTANA R, et al. Features and outcomes of 899 patients with drug-induced liver injury: The DILIN prospective study[J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 148( 7): 1340- 1352.e7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006.
    [11]
    HAO KY, WANG Y, YU YC. An excerpt of the EASL clinical practice guidelines on haemochromatosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 9): 1999- 2004. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.09.011.

    郝坤艳, 汪勇, 于乐成.《2022年欧洲肝病学会血色病临床实践指南》摘译[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 9): 1999- 2004. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.09.011.
    [12]
    HE FL, MA L, LI YR, et al. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: The highlight of its diagnosis[J]. J Pract Hepatol, 2022, 25( 1): 1- 4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.01.001.

    何福亮, 马琳, 李悦榕, 等. 非肝硬化性门脉高压的临床诊断[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2022, 25( 1): 1- 4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2022.01.001.
    [13]
    CAO XX, GAO YQ, ZHANG WH, et al. Cholestasis morbidity rate in first-hospitalized patients with chronic liver disease in Shanghai[J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2015, 23( 8): 569- 573. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2015.08.003.

    曹旬旬, 高月求, 张文宏, 等. 基于上海市住院慢性肝病患者胆汁淤积患病率的调查研究[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2015, 23( 8): 569- 573. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2015.08.003.
    [14]
    CHEN ZB, YAO DK. Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis[J]. Int J Dig Dis, 2006, 26( 4): 279- 281. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2006.04.025.

    陈朱波, 姚定康. 进行性家族性肝内胆汁淤积[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2006, 26( 4): 279- 281. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2006.04.025.
    [15]
    WANG XJ, CHEN CW. Benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis[J]. Chin Hepatol, 2000, 5( 1): 31- 32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2000.01.015.

    王晓今, 陈成伟. 良性复发性肝内胆汁淤积[J]. 肝脏, 2000, 5( 1): 31- 32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1704.2000.01.015.
    [16]
    ZHENG YF, ZHANG XL, WENG YH, et al. Etiological spectrum and clinical features of patients with unexplained liver disease manifesting as isolated jaundice: An analysis of 91 cases[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2023, 39( 5): 1105- 1109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.05.016.

    郑玉凤, 张胥磊, 翁宇航, 等. 91例以单纯性黄疸为表现的不明原因肝病患者病因谱及临床特征分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39( 5): 1105- 1109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.05.016.
    [17]
    KATAREY D, VERMA S. Drug-induced liver injury[J]. Clin Med, 2016, 16( Suppl 6): s104- s109. DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s104.
    [18]
    HUANG CY, CHEN J, ZHANG XD, et al. Serum ALT/ALP ratio changes and histopathological features of patients with drug-induced liver injury acute hepatocellular type[J]. J Pract Hepatol, 2021, 24( 3): 379- 382. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.03.019.

    黄春洋, 陈杰, 张小丹, 等. 临床诊断的肝细胞型急性药物性肝损伤患者血清ALT/ALP比值变化特点与组织病理学特征分析[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2021, 24( 3): 379- 382. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2021.03.019.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (152) PDF downloads(37) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return