中文｜English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 41 Issue 10
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Journal of Clinical Hepatology  > 2025  >  41(10): 2102-2109

Construction and validation of a novel prognostic risk scoring table for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

DOI: 10.12449/JCH251021

  • Department of Infectious Diseases，Tangdu Hospital，Air Force Medical University，Xi’an 710038，China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIAN Jianqi， lianjq@fmmu.edu.cn （ORCID： 0000-0002-5549-7590）
  • Received Date: 2025-03-23
  • Accepted Date: 2025-06-04
  • Published Date: 2025-10-25
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To investigate the clinical features of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure （ACLF）， and to construct a risk scoring table that can accurately predict the prognosis of patients in the early stage.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 502 patients with ACLF who were admitted to Tangdu Hospital， Air Force Medical University， from January 1， 2010 to December 31， 2020 （training set）， and the influencing factors for 28-day mortality rate were identified. The 69 ACLF patients who were admitted to Tangdu Hospital， Air Force Medical University， from January 1 to December 31， 2021 were enrolled as the validation set. The independent-samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups， and the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. A univariate Cox regression analysis was used to obtain the early warning indicators associated with the 28-day prognosis of ACLF patients， and variance inflation factors were used to assess multicollinearity among predictors； a multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to construct a risk model for ACLF prognosis （mortality）. A risk scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） was developed based on regression coefficients （β） from the model equation and weight assignments in the nomogram. Internal validation and comparison were performed for the risk model for ACLF prognosis （mortality）， the scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality）， and other scoring models （Child-Turcotte-Pugh ［CTP］ score， Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ［MELD］ score， MELD combined with serum sodium concentration ［MELD-Na］ score， and integrated MELD ［iMELD］ score） in the training set， while external validation and comprehensive evaluation of the scoring table and the other scoring models were performed in the validation set. The Nagelkerke’s R2 test and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to assess the degree of fitting of the risk model for ACLF prognosis （mortality）， the scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality）， and other scoring models， and fitting curves were plotted. C-index was used to assess the discriminatory ability of the scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） and the other scoring models， and the Z-test was used for comparison of C-index between different models. The decision curve analysis was used to compare the clinical benefits of the scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） and the other scoring models.  Results  The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age （hazard ratio ［HR］=1.027， 95% confidence interval ［CI］： 1.015 — 1.039， P<0.001）， hepatic encephalopathy grade （grade 1： HR=2.928， 95%CI： 1.463 — 5.858， P=0.002； grade 2： HR=3.811， 95%CI： 2.078 — 6.988， P<0.001； grade 3： HR=3.916， 95%CI： 1.917 — 8.001， P<0.001； grade 4： HR=6.966， 95%CI： 4.559 — 10.644， P<0.001）， an increase in total bilirubin （TBil） by ≥17.1 μmol/L per day （HR=1.771， 95%CI： 1.248 — 2.513， P=0.001）， creatinine （HR=1.005， 95%CI： 1.004 — 1.006， P<0.001）， neutrophil count （HR=1.092， 95%CI： 1.060 — 1.126， P<0.001）， and international normalized ratio （HR=1.298， 95%CI： 1.187 — 1.418， P<0.001） were independent risk factors associated with the 28-day mortality rate of ACLF patients， and a risk scoring table was constructed for ACLF prognosis （mortality）. The Nagelkerke’s R2 test showed that the risk scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） had an R2 value of 0.599 in the training set and 0.722 in the validation set， which were higher than the R2 values of CTP， MELD， MELD-Na， and iMELD scores. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the risk scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） had a P value of 0.280 in the training set and 0.788 in the validation set. The C-index analysis showed that the scoring table had a higher C-index than the other scoring models in the validation set （all P<0.001）， as well as a higher C-index than CTP score in the training set （P<0.001）. The decision curve analysis showed that the risk scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） had higher clinical net benefits than the other scoring models.  Conclusion  Compared with other scoring models currently used in clinical practice， the novel risk scoring table for ACLF prognosis （mortality） constructed based on the six predictive factors of age， hepatic encephalopathy grade， an increase in TBil by ≥17.1 μmol/L per day， creatinine， neutrophil count， and international normalized ratio has a relatively high value in predicting the 28-day prognosis of ACLF patients.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(21)
  • [1]
    BI ZH, WANG LX, LIAN JQ. Definition, prognostic assessment, and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 7): 1671- 1676. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.07.041.

    毕占虎, 王临旭, 连建奇. 慢加急性肝衰竭的定义、预后评估及诊治进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 7): 1671- 1676. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.07.041.
    [2]
    BAJAJ JS, O’LEARY JG, LAI JC, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure clinical guidelines[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2022, 117( 2): 225- 252. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001595.
    [3]
    MOREAU R, JALAN R, GINES P, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144( 7): 1426- 1437. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.042.
    [4]
    SARIN SK, CHOUDHURY A, SHARMA MK, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver(APASL): An update[J]. Hepatol Int, 2019, 13( 4): 353- 390. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-019-09946-3.
    [5]
    LI JQ, LIANG X, YOU SL, et al. Development and validation of a new prognostic score for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Hepatol, 2021, 75( 5): 1104- 1115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.026.
    [6]
    PUGH RN, MURRAY-LYON IM, DAWSON JL, et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices[J]. Br J Surg, 1973, 60( 8): 646- 649. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800600817.
    [7]
    MALINCHOC M, KAMATH PS, GORDON FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 31( 4): 864- 871. DOI: 10.1053/he.2000.5852.
    [8]
    BIGGINS SW, KIM WR, TERRAULT NA, et al. Evidence-based incorporation of serum sodium concentration into MELD[J]. Gastroenterology, 2006, 130( 6): 1652- 1660. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.02.010.
    [9]
    LUCA A, ANGERMAYR B, BERTOLINI G, et al. An integrated MELD model including serum sodium and age improves the prediction of early mortality in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Liver Transpl, 2007, 13( 8): 1174- 1180. DOI: 10.1002/lt.21197.
    [10]
    Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure(2024 version)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2024, 40( 12): 2371- 2387. DOI: 10.12449/JCH241-206.

    中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组, 中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2024年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40( 12): 2371- 2387. DOI: 10.12449/JCH241206.
    [11]
    Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese guidelines on the management of liver cirrhosis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35( 11): 2408- 2425. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.11.006.

    中华医学会肝病学分会. 肝硬化诊治指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35( 11): 2408- 2425. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.11.006.
    [12]
    WU TZ, LI J, SHAO L, et al. Development of diagnostic criteria and a prognostic score for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Gut, 2018, 67( 12): 2181- 2191. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314641.
    [13]
    JALAN R, YURDAYDIN C, BAJAJ JS, et al. Toward an improved definition of acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Gastroenterology, 2014, 147( 1): 4- 10. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.005.
    [14]
    TREBICKA J. Predisposing factors in acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2016, 36( 2): 167- 173. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1583195.
    [15]
    BAJAJ JS, O’LEARY JG, REDDY KR, et al. Survival in infection-related acute-on-chronic liver failure is defined by extrahepatic organ failures[J]. Hepatology, 2014, 60( 1): 250- 256. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27077.
    [16]
    MARTIN-MATEOS R, ALVAREZ-MON M, ALBILLOS A. Dysfunctional immune response in acute-on-chronic liver failure: It takes two to tango[J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 973. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00973.
    [17]
    WU W, SUN SS, WANG YJ, et al. Circulating neutrophil dysfunction in HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12: 620365. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.620365.
    [18]
    LEMMER P, POSPIECH JC, CANBAY A. Liver failure-future challenges and remaining questions[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9( 8): 734. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4968.
    [19]
    KIM A, NIU BL, WORETA T, et al. Clinical considerations of coagulopathy in acute liver failure[J]. J Clin Transl Hepatol, 2020, 8( 4): 407- 413. DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00058.
    [20]
    van den BOOM BP, LISMAN T. Pathophysiology and management of bleeding and thrombosis in patients with liver disease[J]. Int J Lab Hematol, 2022, 44( Suppl 1): 79- 88. DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13856.
    [21]
    LAI M, XU MM, WANG X, et al. Prognostic evaluation of liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Organ Transplant, 2025, 16( 3): 482- 488. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025002.

    赖曼, 徐曼曼, 王鑫, 等. 慢加急性肝衰竭肝移植预后评估[J]. 器官移植, 2025, 16( 3): 482- 488. DOI: 10.12464/j.issn.1674-7445.2025002.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(5)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (66) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
        

    The first journal specializing in hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases in China

    Supervisor：Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China

    Sponsor：Jilin University

    Academic Support: Chinese Society of Hepatology，Chinese Medical Association

    Address: 461 Xinjiang Road, Changchun

    Submit：0431-88782044

    Peer review：0431-88783542

    Email：lcgdb@vip.163.com

    About Journal

    Submission Guideline

    Journal Online

    Hepatobiliary College

    Guidelines

    YesterdayIP[]YesterdayPV[]TodayIP[]TodayPV[]Online[]

    Website Design © 2020 Editorial Board of Journal of Clinical Hepatology 吉ICP备10000617号-1 Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return