中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 40 Issue 11
Nov.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Effect of amlodipine and levamlodipine on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in rats and related mechanisms

DOI: 10.12449/JCH241118
Research funding:

Hebei Natural Science Foundation Project (H2022307063);

Government-funded Program for Outstanding Clinical Medical Talent Development (202218);

Hebei Provincial Medical Applicable Technology Tracking Project (GZ2022007)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: BAI Wanjun, baiwanjun0311@163.com (ORCID: 0009-0008-3266-8765)
  • Received Date: 2024-04-01
  • Accepted Date: 2024-05-06
  • Published Date: 2024-11-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the effect of amlodipine and levamlodipine on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib and related mechanisms.  Methods  A total of 18 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into lenvatinib (1.2 mg/kg) group, amlodipine (1.0 mg/kg)+lenvatinib group, and levamlodipine (0.5 mg/kg)+lenvatinib group, with 6 rats in each group. The rats were pretreated with 0.5% sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, amlodipine or levamlodipine by gavage for 8 days, and lenvatinib was given after the last intragastric administration. Blood samples were collected from the intraocular canthus venous plexus at the specified time points. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure the plasma concentration of lenvatinib in rats, and a non-compartment model was used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. RT-qPCR was used to measure the mRNA expression levels of cytochrome P450 3A1 (CYP3A1), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in rat liver tissue. A one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups, and the Dunnett-t test was used for further comparison between two groups; the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups.  Results  There were significant differences between the three groups in the area under the concentration-time curve AUC0-∞F=4.567, P<0.05), clearance rate CLz/FF=5.038, P<0.05), and peak concentration CmaxF=11.667, P<0.01). Compared with the lenvatinib group, the amlodipine+lenvatinib group had an increase in AUC0-∞ by 36.1% (P<0.05), a reduction in CLz/F by 26.1% (P<0.05), and an increase in Cmax by 56.7% (P<0.01), and the levamlodipine+lenvatinib group had an increase in Cmax by 37.7% (P<0.05). RT-qPCR showed that there were significant differences in the mRNA expression levels of CYP3A1, P-gp, and BCRP between the three groups (F=10.160, 5.350, and 5.237, all P<0.05), and compared with the lenvatinib group, the amlodipine+lenvatinib group had significant reductions in the mRNA expression levels of CYP3A1, P-gp, and BCRP in rat liver tissue (all P<0.05), while the levamlodipine+lenvatinib group had a significant reduction in the mRNA expression level of CYP3A1 in rat liver tissue (P<0.05).  Conclusion  Amlodipine can increase the invivo exposure of lenvatinib possibly by inhibiting the mRNA expression of CYP3A1, P-gp, and BCRP in the liver, while levamlodipine only increases the peak concentration of lenvatinib.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    LI JJ, YANG HH, HUO G. Analysis of clinical features,cell morphology and prognostic factors in patients with primary liver cancer[J]. J Clin Exp Med, 2024, 23( 6): 566- 570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.06.002.

    李姣姣, 杨会会, 霍刚. 原发性肝癌患者临床特征、细胞形态学分析及其预后的影响因素分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2024, 23( 6): 566- 570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.06.002.
    [2]
    General Office of National Health Commission. Standard for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer(2022 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2022, 38( 2): 288- 303. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.009.

    国家卫生健康委办公厅. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2022, 38( 2): 288- 303. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.02.009.
    [3]
    LI J, ZHANG YJ, XIA JL. Interpretation of NCCN clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma, version 1.2023[J]. J Pract Oncol, 2023, 38( 5): 408- 415. DOI: 10.13267/j.cnki.syzlzz.2023.064.

    李婕, 章赟杰, 夏景林. 2023年第1版NCCN肝细胞癌临床实践指南更新解读[J]. 实用肿瘤杂志, 2023, 38( 5): 408- 415. DOI: 10.13267/j.cnki.syzlzz.2023.064.
    [4]
    XU HC, WANG FL, XIE LH. Current status and perspectives in clinical treatment of intermediate and advanced primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Changchun Univ Chin Med, 2024, 40( 1): 103- 107. DOI: 10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2024.01.024.

    许华晨, 王凤玲, 谢林虎. 中晚期原发性肝细胞癌的临床治疗现状与展望[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2024, 40( 1): 103- 107. DOI: 10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2024.01.024.
    [5]
    AL-SALAMA ZT, SYED YY, SCOTT LJ. Lenvatinib: A review in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Drugs, 2019, 79( 6): 665- 674. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-019-01116-x.
    [6]
    ZHAO Y, ZHANG YN, WANG KT, et al. Lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: From preclinical mechanisms to anti-cancer therapy[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2020, 1874( 1): 188391. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188391.
    [7]
    LI JM, WANG XQ, NING C, et al. Influences of ABC transporter and CYP3A4/5 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in Chinese healthy subjects[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2020, 76( 8): 1125- 1133. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02879-z.
    [8]
    OZEKI T, NAGAHAMA M, FUJITA K, et al. Influence of CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter polymorphisms on lenvatinib plasma trough concentrations in Japanese patients with thyroid cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9( 1): 5404. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41820-y.
    [9]
    YANG XR, SUN HC, XIE Q, et al. Chinese expert guidance on overall application of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2023, 22( 2): 167- 180. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230201-00035.

    杨欣荣, 孙惠川, 谢青, 等. 仑伐替尼肝癌全病程应用中国专家指导意见[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22( 2): 167- 180. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230201-00035.
    [10]
    FOGLI S, GIANFILIPPO G, CUCCHIARA F, et al. Clinical pharmacology and drug-drug interactions of lenvatinib in thyroid cancer[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2021, 163: 103366. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103366.
    [11]
    KIM BH, YU SJ, KANG W, et al. Expert consensus on the management of adverse events in patients receiving lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 37( 3): 428- 439. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15727.
    [12]
    WALIANY S, SAINANI KL, PARK LS, et al. Increase in blood pressure associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor[J]. JACC CardioOncol, 2019, 1( 1): 24- 36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2019.08.012.
    [13]
    CHEN SJ, KUANG ZM, YUAN H, et al. Advances in research on interactions between amlodipine and other drugs[J]. Chin J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2014, 19( 6): 701- 706.

    陈沈珏, 匡泽民, 袁洪, 等. 氨氯地平与其他药物的相互作用研究进展[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2014, 19( 6): 701- 706.
    [14]
    ZHU YL, WANG F, LI Q, et al. Amlodipine metabolism in human liver microsomes and roles of CYP3A4/5 in the dihydropyridine dehydrogenation[J]. Drug Metab Dispos, 2014, 42( 2): 245- 249. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.055400.
    [15]
    NAIK KN, JHAJHARIA K, CHAUDHARY R, et al. Multidrug resistance 1 gene polymorphism in amlodipine-induced gingival enlargement[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2015, 19( 2): 239- 241. DOI: 10.4103/0972-124X.145837.
    [16]
    DARVARI R, BOROUJERDI M. Concentration dependency of modulatory effect of amlodipine on P-glycoprotein efflux activity of doxorubicin: A comparison with tamoxifen[J]. J Pharm Pharmacol, 2004, 56( 8): 985- 991. DOI: 10.1211/0022357043941.
    [17]
    TAKARA K, MATSUBARA M, YAMAMOTO K, et al. Differential effects of calcium antagonists on ABCG2/BCRP-mediated drug resistance and transport in SN-38-resistant HeLa cells[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2012, 5( 3): 603- 609. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2011.734.
    [18]
    ZHOU YN, ZHANG BK, LI J, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in rats[J]. Xenobiotica, 2013, 43( 8): 699- 704. DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2012.756992.
    [19]
    KUZUYA T, KOBAYASHI T, MORIYAMA N, et al. Amlodipine, but not MDR1 polymorphisms, alters the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A in Japanese kidney transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2003, 76( 5): 865- 868. DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000084873.20157.67.
    [20]
    CUI YJ, LI Y, FAN LJ, et al. UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of Lenvatinib in rat plasma and its application to drug-drug interaction studies[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2021, 206: 114360. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114360.
    [21]
    CUI YJ, LI Y, GUO CH, et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between canagliflozin and sorafenib or lenvatinib in rats[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27( 17): 5419. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175419.
    [22]
    CUI YJ, MA YL, LI Y, et al. Influence of schisantherin A on the pharmacokinetics of lenvatinib in rats and its potential mechanism[J]. J Gastrointest Oncol, 2022, 13( 2): 802- 811. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-174.
    [23]
    CUI YJ, LI Y, LI X, et al. A simple UPLC/MS-MS method for simultaneous determination of lenvatinib and telmisartan in rat plasma, and its application to pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27( 4): 1291. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27041291.
    [24]
    Center for Drug Evaluation, NMPA. Technical guidelines for drug interaction studies(Trial)[EB/OL].( 2021-01-26)[ 2024-03-12]. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/5a15b727e605482c1cf594c689bb994b. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/5a15b727e605482c1cf594c689bb994b

    国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心. 药物相互作用研究技术指导原则(试行)[EB/OL].( 2021-01-26)[ 2024-03-12]. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/5a15b727e605482c1cf594c689bb994b. https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/5a15b727e605482c1cf594c689bb994b
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (98) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return