Treatment of portal hypertension with combined vagus trunk-preserving portoazygous devascularization and shunting: Report of 28 cases
-
摘要:
目的探讨保留迷走神经干门奇断流加分流术(VTPPDS)治疗门静脉高压症的疗效。方法对比分析我院2005年至2011年28例VTPPDS(n=28)和30例门奇断流加幽门成形术(PD+PP;n=30)治疗门静脉高压症的临床资料,对两组资料术后胃肠功能恢复(术后72 h内)、术后腹胀、再出血、腹水变化、住院时间(14 d内出院)采用卡方检验进行统计分析。结果 VTPPDS治疗组,27例治愈,1例死于肝衰竭。与PD+PP对照组对比,VTPPDS治疗组术后胃肠功能恢复明显更快(60.0 vs 85.7%,P<0.05),食后腹胀率(43.3%vs 7.1%,P<0.01),及再出血率(26.7%vs 7.1%,P<0.05)均更低,腹水减少或消失率(62.5%vs95.5%,P<0.01)更高,住院时间更短(53.3%vs 78.6%,P<0.05)。结论 VTPPDS术式是治疗门静脉高压症的有效手术方法,并且术后效果比PD+PP术式更具优越性。
-
关键词:
- 肝硬化 /
- 高血压,门静脉 /
- 迷走神经 /
- 门奇静脉断流加分流术
Abstract:Objective To investigate the therapeutic outcome of surgical intervention with combined vagus trunk-preserving portoazygous devascularization and shunting (VTPPDS) to treat patients with portal hypertension.Methods The clinical data of portal hypertension patients who underwent VTPPDS (n=28) or portoazygous devascularization in combination with pyloroplasty (PD+PP;n=30) in our hospital from 2005 to 2011 were collected for comparative analysis.The statistical significance of differential rates of gastroenteric function recovery (within 72 hrs post-surgery) , postoperative ventosity and postoperative hemorrhage, status of ascites, and length of hospital stay (discharge within 14 days) were compared between the two groups using the Chi-squared test.Results In the VTPPDS group, 27 patients were cured and one patient died of liver failure.When compared to the PD+PP group, the VTPPDS group showed significantly earlier recovery of gastroenteric function (60.0% vs.85.7%, P<0.05) , lower incidences of postoperative ventosity (43.3% vs.7.1%, P<0.01) and postoperative hemorrhage (26.7% vs.7.1%, P<0.05) , higher incidences of ascites reduction/disappearance (62.5% vs.95.5%, P<0.01) , and shorter length of hospital stay (53.3% vs.78.6%, P<0.05) .Conclusion The VTPPDS procedure is an effective surgical method to treat portal hypertension, and provides superior post-operative outcomes to the PD+PP procedure.
-
Key words:
- liver cirrhosis /
- hypertension /
- portal /
- vagus nerve
-
[1]Du LX, Zhang Y, Wu WJ, et al.Application of technique ofspleen subpedicle dissection for splenectomy in reformed splenoca-val shunt in portal hypertension patients[J].J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2010, 18 (1) :31-34. (in Chinese) 杜立学, 张煜, 吴武军, 等.二级脾蒂解剖在门静脉高压症分流术中的应用[J].肝胆外科杂志, 2010, 18 (1) :31-34. [2]Lv YF, Zhu QH, Lin CF, et al.Treatment of portal hypertensionwith vagus trunk preserving portoazygous devascularization[J].ChinJ Hepatobiliary Surg, 2000, 6 (5) :346-348. (in Chinese) 吕云福, 祝庆华, 蔺春芳, 等.保留迷走神经主干门奇断流术治疗门静脉高压症[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2000, 6 (5) :346-348. [3]Fei Y, Li JY, Wang SB.Clinical study on 51 cases with portal veinhypertension treated by portoazyous devasculariation preserving la-tarjet nerev[J].J North China Coal Med Coll, 2006, 8 (4) :440-441. (in Chinese) 费阳, 李基业, 王世斌.保留Latarjet神经门奇断流术治疗门静脉高压症51例分析[J].华北煤炭医学院学报, 2006, 8 (4) :440-441. [4]Huang YT.Surgery of portal hypertension[M].People's Medical Pub-lishing House, 2002:531-532. (in Chinese) 黄莚庭.门静脉高压症外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2002:531-532. [5]Chen W, Luo M, Sun YW, et al.Function of portal pressure dur-ing operation on the choice of surgical approaches in portal hyperten-sion[J].Chin J Surg, 2008, 46 (22) :1703-1706. (in Chinese) 陈炜, 罗蒙, 孙勇伟, 等.术中门静脉压力动态测定在门静脉高压症术式选择中的作用[J].中华外科杂志, 2008, 46 (22) :1703-1706. [6]Gao DM.Why is SRS-PCDV a relatively feasible surgical ap-proach in treatment of portal hypertension?[J].J Surg Conceptspract, 2009, 14 (1) :89-90.高德明.为何脾肾分流加断流联合术是治疗门静脉高压症较为合理的术式?[J].外科理论与实践, 2009, 14 (1) :89-90.
计量
- 文章访问数: 3398
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 672
- 被引次数: 0