血清簇集蛋白、1-磷酸鞘氨醇水平对脓毒症急性肝损伤患者的预后价值
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.12.018
Value of the serum levels of Clusterin and sphingosine 1-phosphate in assessing the prognosis of sepsis patients with acute liver injury
-
摘要:
目的 探讨血清簇集蛋白(Clusterin)、1-磷酸鞘氨醇(S1P)水平对脓毒症急性肝损伤患者预后的评估价值。 方法 选择2019年3月—2022年5月徐州医科大学附属连云港医院收治的脓毒症急性肝损伤患者127例,根据患者治疗28 d预后情况分为死亡组35例、存活组92例。计量资料两组间比较采用成组t检验,计数资料两组间比较采用χ2检验,对可能影响患者预后的各因素进行单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析,相关性分析采用Pearson相关性分析,采用受试者工作特征曲线分析血清Clusterin、S1P对患者预后评估价值。 结果 两组患者肝损伤程度、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、合并急性肾损伤、凝血酶原时间(PT)、国际标准化比值(INR)、Child-Pugh肝功能分级以及C反应蛋白比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。死亡组患者血清Clusterin、S1P水平均显著低于存活组(t值分别11.094、10.390,P值均<0.05)。重度肝损伤患者血清Clusterin、S1P水平显著低于轻、中度肝损伤患者(t值分别为9.825、11.418,P值均<0.05)。多因素回归分析显示,肝损伤程度(OR=1.260,95%CI:1.081~1.468)、APACHE Ⅱ评分(OR=1.031,95%CI:1.019~1.044)、SOFA评分(OR=1.066,95%CI:1.039~1.094)、Clusterin(OR=0.899,95%CI:0.859~0.940)和S1P(OR=0.824,95%CI:0.749~0.908)为影响脓毒症患者预后的独立危险因素(P值均<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清Clusterin、S1P与二者联合对患者预后评估价值的曲线下面积分别为0.864、0.861、0.949。脓毒症急性肝损伤患者血清Clusterin、S1P与ALT、TBil、PT、INR均呈显著负相关关系(P值均<0.05)。 结论 与存活组相比,脓毒症急性肝损伤死亡患者血清Clusterin以及S1P显著降低,且Clusterin以及S1P水平与患者肝损伤程度密切相关,二者联合对脓毒症急性肝损伤患者预后具有着较好的预测价值,有望成为脓毒症急性肝损患者预后预测的潜在标志物。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of the serum levels of Clusterin and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) in assessing the prognosis of sepsis patients with acute liver injury. Methods A total of 127 sepsis patients with acute liver injury who were admitted to Lianyungang Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, from March 2019 to May 2022 were enrolled, and according to their prognosis after 28 days of treatment, they were divided into death group with 35 patients and survival group with 92 patients. The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. A pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation. The prognostic value of serum Clusterin and S1P was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve. Results There were significant differences between the two groups in the degree of liver injury, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the presence or absence of acute kidney injury, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), Child-Pugh class, and C-reactive protein (all P<0.05). The death group had significantly lower serum levels of Clusterin and S1P than the survival group (t=11.094 and 10.390, both P<0.05). The patients with severe liver injury had significantly lower serum levels of Clusterin and S1P than those with mild or moderate liver injury (t=9.825 and 11.418, both P<0.05). The multivariate regression analysis showed that the degree of liver injury (odds ratio [OR]=1.260, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.081 — 1.468, P<0.05), APACHEII score (OR=1.031, 95%CI: 1.019 — 1.044, P<0.05), SOFA score (OR=1.066, 95%CI: 1.039 — 1.094, P<0.05), Clusterin (OR=0.899, 95%CI: 0.859 — 0.940, P<0.05), and S1P (OR=0.824, 95%CI: 0.749 — 0.908, P<0.05) were independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with sepsis. The ROC curve analysis showed that serum Clusterin and S1P used alone or in combination had an area under the ROC curve of 0.864, 0.861, and 0.949, respectively. Serum Clusterin and S1P were significantly negatively correlated with alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, PT, and INR in sepsis patients with acute liver injury (all P<0.05). Conclusion The sepsis patients with acute liver injury who died had significant reductions in serum Clusterin and S1P compared with those who survived, and the levels of Clusterin and S1P are closely associated with the degree of liver injury. The combination of Clusterin and S1P has a good value in predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients with acute liver injury and is expected to become a potential marker for predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients with acute liver injury. -
Key words:
- Sepsis /
- Acute Liver Injury /
- Clusterin /
- Sphingosine-1-Phosphate /
- Prognosis
-
表 1 两组患者临床资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of clinical data between the two groups
指标 死亡组(n=35) 存活组(n=92) 统计值 P值 性别(例) χ2=0.045 0.831 男 19 48 女 16 44 年龄(岁) 57.28±10.21 58.33±10.93 t=0.492 0.623 HR(次/min) 123.95±17.33 121.64±15.62 t=0.722 0.471 MAP(mmHg) 60.49±9.85 61.11±10.21 t=0.309 0.758 感染部位(例) χ2=1.511 0.680 肺及胸腔 6 19 腹腔 7 22 泌尿系 9 27 其他 13 24 肝损伤程度(例) χ2=11.825 0.001 轻度、中度 14 67 重度 21 25 APACHE Ⅱ评分 24.59±6.22 17.32±5.25 t=6.189 <0.001 SOFA评分 15.28±3.12 12.10±2.11 t=6.598 <0.001 机械通气(例) χ2=0.233 0.630 是 13 30 否 22 62 合并凝血功能障碍(例) χ2=0.378 0.539 是 9 19 否 26 73 合并急性肾损伤(例) χ2=7.995 0.005 是 15 17 否 20 75 氧合指数(mmHg) 126.92±25.20 128.52±21.50 t=0.357 0.722 PT(s) 16.94±2.41 15.38±2.16 t=3.369 0.001 INR 1.95±0.31 1.64±0.26 t=5.686 <0.001 Child-Pugh分级(例) χ2=-2.485 0.013 A级 3 24 B级 17 45 C级 15 23 CRP(mg/L) 22.39±5.17 19.38±4.22 t=3.369 0.001 表 2 两组患者血清Clusterin、S1P水平比较
Table 2. Comparison of serum Clusterin and S1P levels between two groups
组别 例数 Clusterin(μg/mL) S1P(ng/mL) 死亡组 35 34.38±10.21 109.38±26.49 存活组 92 92.74±30.41 197.43±47.32 t值 11.094 10.390 P值 <0.001 <0.001 表 3 不同肝损伤程度患者血清Clusterin、S1P水平比较
Table 3. Comparison of blood Clusterin and S1P levels in patients with different degrees of liver injury
组别 例数 Clusterin(μg/mL) S1P(ng/mL) 轻、中度 81 96.27±35.62 205.73±47.39 重度 46 42.59±13.31 115.48±33.15 t值 9.825 11.418 P值 <0.001 <0.001 表 4 影响患者预后的多因素分析
Table 4. Multivariate analysis affecting prognosis of patients
指标 B值 SE χ2值 P值 OR 95%CI 肝损伤程度(轻、中度=0,重度=1) 0.231 0.078 8.771 0.003 1.260 1.081~1.468 APACHE Ⅱ评分 0.031 0.006 26.694 <0.001 1.031 1.019~1.044 SOFA评分 0.064 0.013 24.237 <0.001 1.066 1.039~1.094 Clusterin -0.107 0.023 21.643 <0.001 0.899 0.859~0.940 S1P -0.193 0.049 15.514 <0.001 0.824 0.749~0.908 表 5 ROC曲线分析血清Clusterin、S1P对患者预后评估价值
Table 5. ROC curve was used to analyze the prognostic value of serum Clusterin and S1P
指标 曲线下面积 最佳截断值 敏感度(%) 特异度(%) P值 95%CI Clusterin 0.864 54.015 μg/mL 84.80 88.60 <0.001 0.781~0.947 S1P 0.861 152.931 ng/mL 81.50 85.70 <0.001 0.784~0.938 联合 0.949 - 87.00 91.40 <0.001 0.915~0.983 表 6 患者血清Clusterin、S1P与ALT、TBil、PT、INR相关性分析
Table 6. Correlation analysis of serum Clusterin, S1P, ALT, TBil, PT and INR
指标 ALT TBil PT INR Clusterin r值 -0.426 -0.365 -0.316 -0.297 P值 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 S1P r值 -0.397 -0.411 -0.325 -0.305 P值 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 -
[1] CAO C, YU MM, CHAI YF. Pathological alteration and therapeutic implications of sepsis-induced immune cell apoptosis[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2019, 10( 10): 782. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-2015-1. [2] HWANG JS, KIM KH, PARK J, et al. Glucosamine improves survival in a mouse model of sepsis and attenuates sepsis-induced lung injury and inflammation[J]. J Biol Chem, 2019, 294( 2): 608- 622. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.004638. [3] MA WK, YANG WG, LIN YH, et al. Predictive efficiency of miR-122a expression and HMGB1 level in serum on prognosis of children with SALI[J]. Shandong Med J, 2021, 61( 18): 20- 24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2021.18.005.马伟科, 杨卫国, 林燕鸿, 等. 血清miR-122a表达、HMGB1水平对脓毒症并发肝损伤患儿预后的预测效能[J]. 山东医药, 2021, 61( 18): 20- 24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2021.18.005. [4] GAO G, LUAN X. Diagnostic performance of clusterin in hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis[J]. Int J Biol Markers, 2022, 37( 4): 404- 411. DOI: 10.1177/03936155221101206. [5] SHAASHUA L, BEN-SHMUEL A, PEVSNER-FISCHER M, et al. BRCA mutational status shapes the stromal microenvironment of pancreatic cancer linking clusterin expression in cancer associated fibroblasts with HSF1 signaling[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13( 1): 6513. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34081-3. [6] DENG Y, WANG RY. Changes in serum clusterin, S1P levels in patients with HBV associated with acute liver failure and their clinical significances[J]. Labeled Immunoass Clin Med, 2021, 28( 9): 1564- 1567, 1613. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2021.09.024.邓盈, 王若宇. HBV相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者血清Clusterin、S1P水平变化及临床意义[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2021, 28( 9): 1564- 1567, 1613. DOI: 10.11748/bjmy.issn.1006-1703.2021.09.024. [7] SHEN YF, ZHAO SJ, WANG SY, et al. S1P/S1PR3 axis promotes aerobic glycolysis by YAP/c-MYC/PGAM1 axis in osteosarcoma[J]. EBioMedicine, 2019, 40: 210- 223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.038. [8] JIANG LB, LI RJ, ZHANG B, et al. 2016 international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock[J]. Chin J Emerg Med, 2017, 26( 3): 263- 266. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2017.03.004.江利冰, 李瑞杰, 张斌, 等. 2016年脓毒症与脓毒性休克处理国际指南[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2017, 26( 3): 263- 266. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2017.03.004. [9] Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure(2018)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35( 1): 38- 44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007.中华医学会感染病学分会肝衰竭与人工肝学组, 中华医学会肝病学分会重型肝病与人工肝学组. 肝衰竭诊治指南(2018年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35( 1): 38- 44. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.01.007. [10] ARORA V, MAIWALL R, RAJAN V, et al. Terlipressin is superior to noradrenaline in the management of acute kidney injury in acute on chronic liver failure[J]. Hepatology, 2020, 71( 2): 600- 610. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30208. [11] CHEN C, CUI J, JI XQ, et al. Analysis of prognostic risk factors in patients with sepsis[J]. Clin J Med Offic, 2021, 49( 1): 61- 63. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2021.01.18.陈城, 崔静, 纪小奇, 等. 脓毒症患者预后危险因素分析[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2021, 49( 1): 61- 63. DOI: 10.16680/j.1671-3826.2021.01.18. [12] WANG FC, ZHANG WJ, LI ZY, et al. Value of Charlson comorbidity index in predicting the prognosis of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2023, 39( 5): 1098- 1104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.05.015.王富春, 张万洁, 李子怡, 等. 查尔森共病指数对慢加急性肝衰竭患者预后的评估价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2023, 39( 5): 1098- 1104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2023.05.015. [13] WANG H, ZHANG X, XUE QL, et al. Effects and mechanism of seabuckthorn polysaccharide on sepsis induced liver injury based on liver specific PPARγ knockout mice[J]. Chin J Immunol, 2022, 38( 7): 789- 794. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2022.07.004.王慧, 张鑫, 薛乾隆, 等. 基于肝脏特异性PPARγ敲除小鼠研究沙棘多糖减轻脓毒症诱导肝损伤的作用及机制[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2022, 38( 7): 789- 794. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2022.07.004. [14] TRIANTAFYLLOU E, GUDD CL, MAWHIN MA, et al. PD-1 blockade improves Kupffer cell bacterial clearance in acute liver injury[J]. J Clin Invest, 2021, 131( 4): e140196. DOI: 10.1172/JCI140196. [15] DAI JM, GUO WN, TAN YZ, et al. Wogonin alleviates liver injury in sepsis through Nrf2-mediated NF-κB signalling suppression[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2021, 25( 12): 5782- 5798. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16604. [16] SUN YB, TENG SY, LUO ZL, et al. Predictive value of serum Clusterin for major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI in patients with acute STEMI[J]. Chin J Evid Bases Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 14( 8): 1008- 1011. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2022.08.28.孙彦博, 滕思勇, 罗振立, 等. 血清Clusterin对急性STEMI患者PCI术后主要不良心血管事件的预测价值[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2022, 14( 8): 1008- 1011. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2022.08.28. [17] WANG YS, SHEN Y, HU TT, et al. Associations between serum clusterin levels and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Endocr Connect, 2023, 12( 7): e220545. DOI: 10.1530/EC-22-0545. [18] UDOMSINPRASERT W, POOVORAWAN Y, CHONGSRISAWAT V, et al. Decreased circulating clusterin reflects severe liver complications after hepatoportoenterostomy of biliary atresia[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10( 1): 19736. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76875-9. [19] BRADLEY D, BLASZCZAK A, YIN Z, et al. Clusterin impairs hepatic insulin sensitivity and adipocyte clusterin associates with cardiometabolic risk[J]. Diabetes Care, 2019, 42( 3): 466- 475. DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0870. [20] PARK JS, LEE WK, KIM HS, et al. Clusterin overexpression protects against western diet-induced obesity and NAFLD[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10( 1): 17484. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73927-y. [21] SEO HY, LEE SH, LEE JH, et al. Clusterin attenuates hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation and downregulating the Smad3 signaling pathway[J]. Cells, 2019, 8( 11): 1442. DOI: 10.3390/cells8111442. [22] SONG YX, WANG DX, WANG Y, et al. Relationship between serum S1P, SFRP1, TIM4 and SFRP5 and lung function, airway inflammation and acute recurrence after treatment in adult patients with acute attack stage of bronchial asthma[J]. Prog Mod Biomed, 2022, 22( 8): 1519- 1523. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.08.025.宋云熙, 王东霞, 王英, 等. 血清S1P、SFRP1、TIM4、SFRP5与成人支气管哮喘急性发作期患者肺功能、气道炎症和治疗后再次急性复发的关系[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22( 8): 1519- 1523. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2022.08.025. [23] KAWAI H, OSAWA Y, MATSUDA M, et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate promotes tumor development and liver fibrosis in mouse model of congestive hepatopathy[J]. Hepatology, 2022, 76( 1): 112- 125. DOI: 10.1002/hep.32256. [24] KIM JY, GARCIA-CARBONELL R, YAMACHIKA S, et al. ER stress drives lipogenesis and steatohepatitis via caspase-2 activation of S1P[J]. Cell, 2018, 175( 1): 133- 145.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.020. -