中文|English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

酒精性肝病相关慢加急性肝衰竭:机制、动态评估与精准管理

艾娜,  崔怀宁,  方晓慧,  柳涛,  高沿航

引用本文:
Citation:

酒精性肝病相关慢加急性肝衰竭:机制、动态评估与精准管理

DOI: 10.12449/JCH260803
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 (U24A20654);

吉林省自然科学基金自由探索重点项目 (YDZJ202401427ZYTS);

吉林省肝脏代谢重点实验室 (YDZJ202502CXJD002);

吉林省全国重点实验室(学科类)重大专项 (BRI202602001GH);

国家重点研发计划 (2024YFE0213800)

利益冲突声明:本文不存在任何利益冲突。
作者贡献声明:艾娜负责拟定写作思路,起草并撰写论文;崔怀宁、方晓慧和柳涛负责收集相关资料并对论文进行修改;高沿航负责设计论文框架,指导撰写并修改文章及最终定稿。
详细信息
    通信作者:

    高沿航, yanhang@jlu.edu.cn (ORCID: 0000-0001-8590-6706)

Alcohol-related liver disease-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure: Mechanisms, dynamic assessment, and precise management

Research funding: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20654);

Natural Science Foundation for Self-Exploration Research of Jilin Province (YDZJ202401427ZYTS);

Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Liver Diseases (YDZJ202502CXJD002);

Major Special Project of the National Key Laboratory of Jilin Province (BRI202602001GH);

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFE0213800)

More Information
    Corresponding author: Gao Yanhang, yanhang@jlu.edu.cn (ORCID: 0000-0001-8590-6706)
  • 摘要: 慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)是慢性肝病急性恶化期的高病死率综合征,以系统性炎症驱动的多器官功能障碍为核心特征。酒精性肝病相关慢加急性肝衰竭(ALD-ACLF)因肠道微生态失衡、内毒素易位及炎症反应放大更为突出,常伴随较高的继发感染风险和肝外器官受累,具有明显的病因学与临床特异性。本综述系统梳理ALD-ACLF的概念边界、病理生理机制、动态预警与预后评估进展,重点评述风险分层及临床管理决策要点,并探讨代谢功能障碍合并酒精相关肝病双重打击表型对ALD-ACLF风险分层的潜在影响。提示临床应进一步强化病因导向的早期识别、动态分层、诱因控制和干预前移,以期为该类患者的精准评估及个体化干预提供参考。

     

  • 注: ALD-ACLF,酒精性肝病相关慢加急性肝衰竭;LPS,脂多糖;PAMP,病原体相关分子模式;TLR4,Toll样受体4;MyD88,髓样分化因子88;NF-κB,核因子κB;IRF3,干扰素调节因子3;p38/ERK MAPK通路,p38/细胞外信号调节激酶丝裂原活化蛋白激酶通路;TNF-α,肿瘤坏死因子α;IL-6,白细胞介素6;IL-1β,白细胞介素1β;IL-8,白细胞介素8;CCL2,CC亚族趋化因子配体2;ROS,活性氧;DAMP,损伤相关分子模式;SIRS,全身炎症反应综合征;CARS,代偿性抗炎反应综合征;HLA-DR,人类白细胞抗原DR;MERTK,Mer受体酪氨酸激酶;CD163,白细胞分化抗原163;PD-L1,程序性死亡受体配体1。

    图  1  ALD-ACLF病理与病理生理学机制

    Figure  1.  Pathological and pathophysiological mechanisms of ALD-ACLF

    表  1  SAH、ALD相关急性失代偿与ALD-ACLF临床特征比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of clinical characteristics among SAH, ALD-related acute decompensation, and ALD-ACLF

    项目 SAH ALD相关急性失代偿 ALD-ACLF
    疾病特点 ALD最严重炎症表型,重症者常突发黄
    疸和肝衰竭
    失代偿期并发症加重,但未进
    入ACLF
    在SAH/ALD基础上由感染和/或系统性
    炎症触发的多器官衰竭综合征
    发病机制 酒精毒性、氧化应激、肠-肝轴失衡及肝
    内炎症共同驱动
    以长期肝纤维化/肝硬化、门静
    脉高压及肝合成功能减退为主
    慢性肝损伤基础上叠加感染和/或系统
    性炎症,导致免疫失衡及器官衰竭
    病理特点 脂肪变、胆汁淤积、肝细胞周围纤维化、
    中性粒细胞浸润、肝细胞气球样变及马
    洛里小体
    以肝硬化结节形成、纤维间隔
    及门静脉高压相关结构改变
    为主
    ALD病变基础上叠加系统性炎症和器
    官衰竭表型
    临床表现 突发黄疸、肝衰竭,可伴凝血障碍、营养
    不良和感染风险升高
    以腹水、肝性脑病及静脉曲张
    出血等失代偿表现为主
    在黄疸和肝功能恶化基础上出现多系
    统受累,常伴感染及器官功能障碍
    器官衰竭 以肝衰竭为主,重症时可进展为ACLF 一般无明确多器官衰竭 可导致多器官衰竭
    短期预后 差 差 最差
    治疗策略 戒酒、营养支持、纠正维生素缺乏,重症者
    可使用糖皮质激素,4 d或7 d以Lille评分
    评估反应,无应答者考虑早期肝移植
    按照失代偿期肝硬化处理,控
    制并发症,并强化戒酒管理
    在上述基础上强调器官支持、积极控制
    感染或炎症诱因,并尽早评估肝移植

    注:ALD,酒精性肝病;SAH,重症酒精性肝炎;ALD-ACLF,酒精性肝病相关慢加急性肝衰竭;ACLF,慢加急性肝衰竭;Lille评分,皮质类固醇治疗反应动态评估指标。

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  ALD-ACLF预后评分体系对比

    Table  2.   Comparison of prognostic scoring systems for ALD-ACLF

    模型名称 主要参数 适用人群 核心优势 主要局限性 近3年进展
    MELD 3.0 胆红素、INR、
    肌酐、血钠、白
    蛋白和性别
    终末期肝病、肝移植
    等待患者
    计算简便,应用广泛,为
    肝移植分配基础
    对系统性炎症反
    应及肝外器官衰
    竭反映不足
    在酒精相关肝炎和酒精性肝
    硬化急性恶化队列中显示出
    较好的短期死亡预测效能
    CLIF-C
    ACLF
    基于6个器官
    系统衰竭评
    估,纳入年龄、
    白细胞计数
    EASL定义下ACLF
    患者
    可同时反映多器官功能
    衰竭和炎症负荷,适用于
    28 d/90 d死亡预测、ICU
    分层及移植决策
    计算相对复杂,
    在极重症ICU患
    者中的预测效能
    有限
    近年ICU验证研究进一步支
    持其临床分层价值;CLIF-C
    ACLF>70分提示极高短期死
    亡风险
    AARC 胆红素、INR、
    肌酐、乳酸及
    肝性脑病
    APASL定义下ACLF
    患者
    具有肝衰竭起始表型及
    动态再评估价值,适用于
    住院早期连续风险分层
    对呼吸、循环衰
    竭表征较弱;跨
    地区外推性有限
    京都共识进一步强化AARC
    动态评估在治疗反应判断及
    短期预后分层中的应用价值

    注:ALD-ACLF,酒精性肝病相关慢加急性肝衰竭;MELD,终末期肝病模型;CLIF-C ACLF,慢性肝衰竭联盟慢加急性肝衰竭评分;AARC,亚太肝病学会慢加急性肝衰竭研究联盟评分;INR,国际标准化比值;EASL,欧洲肝病学会;ACLF,慢加急性肝衰竭;APASL,亚太肝病学会;ICU,重症监护病房。

    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同病因相关ACLF的临床特征比较

    Table  3.   Comparison of the clinical characteristics of ACLF associated with different etiologies

    项目 ALD-ACLF HBV-ACLF HCV-ACLF AIH-ACLF
    常见诱因 持续饮酒或复饮、SAH、细
    菌感染
    HBV再激活、停药、病毒学
    反弹后免疫暴发
    感染、出血或药物打击 免疫暴发、减停免疫抑制
    后反跳
    炎症特点 中性粒细胞主导,高炎症
    负荷
    肝内免疫损伤和肝细胞坏
    死突出
    多与失代偿基础上的继发打击
    有关
    自身免疫攻击介导
    器官衰竭 肝外器官衰竭突出 以肝衰竭为主 肝衰竭或多器官功能障碍并见 可迅速进展为重度肝衰竭
    治疗重点 戒酒、抗感染、营养支持、
    AKI/HRS管理
    尽早启动抗病毒治疗、肝
    支持、移植评估
    去除诱因、器官支持、活动性
    HCV评估抗病毒时机
    评估糖皮质激素反应,移
    植评估
    预后关键 感染控制、AKI进展、肝外
    器官衰竭负荷
    肝细胞残存功能、胆红素
    及INR变化
    肝功能储备、诱因可逆性、器官
    衰竭程度
    激素反应性、肝衰竭进展
    程度及移植时机

    注:ACLF,慢加急性肝衰竭;ALD,酒精性肝病;HBV,乙型肝炎病毒;HCV,丙型肝炎病毒;AIH,自身免疫性肝炎;SAH,重症酒精性肝炎;AKI,急性肾损伤;HRS,肝肾综合征;INR,国际标准化比值。

    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Raya Tonetti F, Eguileor A, Mrdjen M, et al. Gut-liver axis: Recent concepts in pathophysiology in alcohol-associated liver disease[J]. Hepatology, 2024, 80( 6): 1342- 1371. DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000924.
    [2] Choudhury A, Kulkarni A V, Arora V, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF): The‘Kyoto consensus’-steps from Asia[J]. Hepatol Int, 2025, 19( 1): 1- 69. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-024-10773-4.
    [3] European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. J Hepatol, 2023, 79( 2): 461- 491. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.021.
    [4] Alvarado-Tapias E, Pose E, Gratacós-Ginès J, et al. Alcohol-associated liver disease: Natural history, management and novel targeted therapies[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2025, 31( Suppl): S112- S133. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2024.0709.
    [5] Artru F, McPhail M J. Immunopathogenesis of acute on chronic liver failure[J]. Am J Transplant, 2024, 24( 5): 724- 732. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.001.
    [6] Guan Y K, Peiffer B, Feng D C, et al. IL-8+ neutrophils drive inexorable inflammation in severe alcohol-associated hepatitis[J]. J Clin Invest, 2024, 134( 9): e178616. DOI: 10.1172/JCI178616.
    [7] Nedunchezhian S, Shetty A, Bhat G, et al. Role of procalcitonin in identifying systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis in acute-on-chronic liver failure and its impact on survival[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2025, 25( 1): 797. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-04352-6.
    [8] Shen H Y, Liangpunsakul S, Iwakiri Y, et al. Immunological mechanisms and emerging therapeutic targets in alcohol-associated liver disease[J]. Cell Mol Immunol, 2025, 22( 10): 1190- 1204. DOI: 10.1038/s41423-025-01291-w.
    [9] Jophlin L L, Singal A K, Bataller R, et al. ACG clinical guideline: Alcohol-associated liver disease[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2024, 119( 1): 30- 54. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002572.
    [10] Nadim M K, Kellum J A, Forni L, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative(ADQI) and International Club of Ascites(ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting[J]. J Hepatol, 2024, 81( 1): 163- 183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.03.031.
    [11] Wan Z H, Wang J J, You S L, et al. Cystatin C is a biomarker for predicting acute kidney injury in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19( 48): 9432- 9438. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9432.
    [12] Yoo J J, Park M Y, Kim S G. Acute kidney injury in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: Clinical significance and management[J]. Kidney Res Clin Pract, 2023, 42( 3): 286- 297. DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.22.264.
    [13] Rafaqat S, Radoman Vujacic I, Behnoush A H, et al. Role of cardiac biomarkers in hepatic disorders: A literature review[J]. Metab Syndr Relat Disord, 2024, 22( 4): 251- 262. DOI: 10.1089/met.2023.0282.
    [14] Šimić S, Svaguša T, Grgurević I, et al. Markers of cardiac injury in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Croat Med J, 2023, 64( 5): 362- 373. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2023.64.362.
    [15] Díaz L A, Fuentes-López E, Ayares G, et al. MELD 3.0 adequately predicts mortality and renal replacement therapy requirements in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis[J]. JHEP Rep, 2023, 5( 8): 100727. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100727.
    [16] Nagel M, Westphal R, Hilscher M, et al. Validation of the CLIF-C OF score and CLIF-C ACLF score to predict transplant-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis and concomitant need for intensive care unit treatment[J]. Medicina(Kaunas), 2023, 59( 5): 866. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59050866.
    [17] Maiwall R, Pasupuleti S S R, Choudhury A, et al. AARC score determines outcomes in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis: A multinational study[J]. Hepatol Int, 2023, 17( 3): 662- 675. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10463-z.
    [18] Zhang Q, Hu J X, Qiu S T, et al. Clinical differences between HBV and alcohol related ACLF in a WGO classification multicenter study[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15( 1): 25292. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09620-9.
    [19] Reiberger T, Lens S, Cabibbo G, et al. EASL position paper on clinical follow-up after HCV cure[J]. J Hepatol, 2024, 81( 2): 326- 344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.04.007.
    [20] European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis[J]. J Hepatol, 2025, 83( 2): 453- 501. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.017.
    [21] Rinella M E, Lazarus J V, Ratziu V, et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature[J]. J Hepatol, 2023, 79( 6): 1542- 1556. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.06.003.
    [22] Arab J P, Díaz L A, Rehm J, et al. Metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related liver disease(MetALD): Position statement by an expert panel on alcohol-related liver disease[J]. J Hepatol, 2025, 82( 4): 744- 756. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.11.028.
    [23] Marti-Aguado D, Calleja J L, Vilar-Gomez E, et al. Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption is associated with increased fibrosis in individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease[J]. J Hepatol, 2024, 81( 6): 930- 940. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.06.036.
    [24] He S K, Liu C H, Wang Y, et al. The prognostic value of sarcopenia in acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2025, 25( 1): 300. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03926-8.
    [25] Ochoa-Allemant P, Hubbard R A, Kaplan D E, et al. Adverse liver outcomes, cardiovascular events, and mortality in steatotic liver disease[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2025, 185( 8): 986- 995. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1809.
    [26] Ochoa-Allemant P, Hubbard R A, Kaplan D E, et al. Cause-specific mortality in patients with steatotic liver disease in the United States[J]. J Hepatol, 2025, 83( 4): 860- 869. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.05.013.
    [27] Hong X, Huang S, Jiang H, et al. Alcohol-related liver disease(ALD): Current perspectives on pathogenesis, therapeutic strategies, and animal models[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2024, 15: 1432480. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1432480.
    [28] Singeap A M, Minea H, Petrea O, et al. Real-world utilization of corticosteroids in severe alcoholic hepatitis: Eligibility, response, and outcomes[J]. Medicina(Kaunas), 2024, 60( 2): 311. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020311.
    [29] European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation[J]. J Hepatol, 2024, 81( 6): 1040- 1086. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.07.032.
    [30] Kimmann M, Trebicka J. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Current interventional treatment options and future challenges[J]. J Pers Med, 2023, 13( 7): 1052. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071052.
  • 加载中
图(1) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  211
  • HTML全文浏览量:  82
  • PDF下载量:  35
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-05-06
  • 录用日期:  2026-07-24
  • 出版日期:  2026-08-25
  • 分享
  • 用微信扫码二维码

    分享至好友和朋友圈

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回