加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术围手术期应用有效性和安全性的系统评价与Meta分析

朱琳; 杨小李; 刘莉; 胥兰婷; 冷远洪; 陈静

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.06.026

加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术围手术期应用有效性和安全性的系统评价与Meta分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.06.026

朱琳¹,
杨小李^{1, 2},
刘莉¹,
胥兰婷¹,
冷远洪¹,
陈静^1, , ,

1.
西南医科大学附属医院肝胆外科，四川泸州 646000
2.
四川省院士(专家)工作站，四川泸州 646000

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 (81802778)

利益冲突声明：本研究不存在研究者、伦理委员会成员、受试者监护人以及与公开研究成果有关的利益冲突。

作者贡献声明：朱琳、杨小李、刘莉负责课题设计，收集数据，资料分析和撰写论文; 胥兰婷、冷远洪参与修改论文; 陈静负责指导撰写文章并最终定稿。

详细信息

通信作者:
陈静， 791697074@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 670
- HTML全文浏览量: 182
- PDF下载量: 47
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-12
- 录用日期: 2021-12-20
- 出版日期: 2022-06-20

Efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

Lin ZHU¹,
Xiaoli YANG^{1, 2},
Li LIU¹,
Lanting XU¹,
Yuanhong LENG¹,
Jing CHEN^{1
, ,
,}

1.
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, China
2.
Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, China

Research funding:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802778)

More Information

Corresponding author: CHEN Jing, 791697074@qq.com(ORCID: 0000-0002-2075-1659)

摘要

摘要: 目的系统评价加速康复外科(ERAS)在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)围手术期应用的有效性和安全性。方法检索中、英文数据库中有关ERAS应用于PD的临床对照研究，检索时间限定为2000年—2021年。对文献进行筛选、质量评价和数据提取，最后采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。本研究已在PROSPERO注册，注册号为: CRD42021287931。结果共纳入22项临床对照研究，包含3511例患者。结果显示，在PD围手术期实施ERAS，与传统术后管理相较，可减少患者总并发症(OR=0.63，95%CI：0.48~0.83，P=0.001)、腹腔感染(OR=0.65，95%CI：0.47~0.88，P=0.005)、肺部并发症(OR=0.57，95%CI：0.42~0.78，P=0.000 5)、胰漏(OR=0.80，95%CI：0.67~0.97，P=0.02)、胃排空障碍(OR=0.58，95%CI：0.48~0.71，P＜0.001)的发生率，并可有效减少术后住院时间(MD=-2.76，95%CI：-3.36~-2.16，P＜0.001)，差异均有统计学意义。但在病死率、切口感染、术后出血率、再次手术和再次入院等方面，两组差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05)。结论 ERAS应用于PD围手术期具有较好的有效性及安全性，可显著减少患者术后并发症的发生率和术后住院时间。
- 加速康复外科 /
- 胰十二指肠切除术 /
- Meta分析
Abstract: Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Chinese and English databases were searched for controlled clinical trials on the application of ERAS in PD published from 2000 to 2021. Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed for the articles, and RevMan5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. This study was registered on PROSPERO with a registration number of CRD42021287931. Results A total of 22 controlled clinical trials were included, with 3531 patients in total. The results showed that the implementation of ERAS in the perioperative period of PD reduced the incidence rates of total complications (odds ratio [OR]=0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.83, P=0.001), abdominal infection (OR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.47-0.88, P=0.005), pulmonary complications (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78, P=0.000 5), pancreatic leakage (OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.97, P=0.02), and delayed gastric emptying (OR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.71, P < 0.001) and effectively shortened the length of postoperative hospital stay (mean difference=-2.76, 95% CI: -3.36 to -2.16, P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in mortality rate, incision infection, postoperative bleeding rate, reoperation, and rehospitalization (all P > 0.05). Conclusion ERAS has good efficacy and safety in the perioperative period of PD and can significantly reduce the incidence rates of postoperative complications and shorten the length of postoperative hospital stay. Therefore, it holds promise for clinical application.
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery /
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy /
- Meta-Analysis

HTML全文

图 1 文献筛选流程图

Figure 1. The flow chart of literature screening

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 两组患者病死率比较的森林图

Figure 2. Forest plot for the comparison of mortality between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 两组患者总并发症发生率比较的森林图

Figure 3. Forest plot for the comparison of the total complication rates between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 两组患者腹腔感染发生率比较的森林图

Figure 4. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of abdominal infection between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 两组患者切口感染发生率比较的森林图

Figure 5. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of incision infection between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 两组患者肺部并发症发生率比较的森林图

Figure 6. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of pulmonary complications between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 两组患者胰漏发生率比较的森林图

Figure 7. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of pancreatic fistula between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 两组患者术后出血发生率比较的森林图

Figure 8. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of postoperative bleeding between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 两组患者术后胃排空障碍发生率比较的森林图

Figure 9. Forest plot of the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying in the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 两组患者术后住院时间比较的森林图

Figure 10. Forest plot for the comparison of postoperative hospital stay in the two groups

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 两组患者再次手术发生率比较的森林图

Figure 11. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of reoperation between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 两组患者再次入院发生率比较的森林图

Figure 12. Forest plot for the comparison of the incidence of readmission between the two groups of patients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 术后出血率的发表偏倚分析

Figure 13. Analysis of publication bias for postoperative bleeding rates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 胰漏的发表偏倚分析

Figure 14. Analysis of publication bias for pancreatic fistula

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 纳入文献基本特征及质量评价

Table 1. Basic characteristics and quality evaluation of the included

作者	年份	国家	研究类型	例数		男/女 (例)	年龄(岁) (ERAS组/Control组)	NOS/Jadad质量评分(分)
作者	年份	国家	研究类型	ERAS组	Control组	男/女 (例)	年龄(岁) (ERAS组/Control组)	NOS/Jadad质量评分(分)
Aviles等^[12]	2017	中国	RCS	40	140	98/82	58±13/57±12	9
Dai等^[13]	2017	中国	RCS	68	98	85/81	58.5(18~69)/59.2(14~83)	8
Deng等^[14]	2017	中国	RCT	76	83	92/67	54.5±12.7/51.3±15.0	5
Hwang等^[15]	2019	韩国	RCT	123	124	153/94	63.3±9.2/62.9±9.2	4
Kapritsou等^[16]	2020	希腊	RCT	44	41	52/33	60.5±11.7/64.8±11.9	6
Kowalsky等^[17]	2019	美国	RCS	123	131	134/120	68.2±9.8/66.3±10.4	8
Lavu等^[18]	2019	美国	RCT	37	39	38/38	65.8±9.6/65.0±9.3	6
Lof等^[19]	2020	英国	RCS	250	125	214/161	65±10.9/66±9.7	8
Partelli等^[20]	2016	意大利	RCS	22	66	47/41	77(75~82)/77.5(75~82)	7
Pineda-Solis等^[21]	2020	美国	RCS	48	56	48/56	66.7±8.6/61.8±13.5	8
Shao等^[22]	2015	中国	RCS	325	310	378/257	56.9±11.5/57±12	8
Su等^[23]	2017	中国	RCS	31	31	37/25	62±9/61±11	8
Takagi等^[24]	2019	日本	RCT	37	37	40/34	67.8±9.7/66.8±9.3	4
Williamsson等^[25]	2015	瑞典	RCS	50	50	57/43	69(15~80)/67(25~81)	8
Zhu等^[26]	2019	中国	RCS	64	69	59/74	64.3±7.9/64.1±11.5	8
Zouros等^[27]	2016	希腊	RCS	75	50	80/45	65.9±10.5/63.9±11.6	9
曹昕彤等^[28]	2021	中国	RCS	32	69	55/46	55(27~76)/56(38~81)	7
李向阳等^[29]	2016	中国	RCS	15	39	36/18	52.7(41~71)/56.6(35~77)	8
梁琦等^[30]	2018	中国	RCS	64	58	68/54	56.3±6.7/54.7±7.9	7
纪柏等^[31]	2019	中国	RCS	50	50	48/52	57.0±14.2/59.3±15.3	8
范闻等^[32]	2018	中国	RCS	51	176	130/97	56.8±1.6/58.2±0.9	8
蔡云强等^[33]	2016	中国	RCS	41	23	38/26	54±5/52±6	8
注：RCS，回顾性临床研究。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(45)

[1]	KEHLET H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(5): 606-617. DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
[2]	LJUNGQVIST O, SCOTT M, FEARON KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A review[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(3): 292-298. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
[3]	BASSE L, RASKOV HH, HJORT JAKOBSEN D, et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition[J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89(4): 446-453. DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02044.x.
[4]	DORCARATTO D, GRANDE L, PERA M. Enhanced recovery in gastrointestinal surgery: Upper gastrointestinal surgery[J]. Dig Surg, 2013, 30(1): 70-78. DOI: 10.1159/000350701.
[5]	MALVIYA A, MARTIN K, HARPER I, et al. Enhanced recovery program for hip and knee replacement reduces death rate[J]. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(5): 577-581. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2011.618911.
[6]	de GROOT JJ, van ES LE, MAESSEN JM, et al. Diffusion of enhanced recovery principles in gynecologic oncology surgery: Is active implementation still necessary?[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 134(3): 570-575. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.019.
[7]	SCHNELLDORFER T, WARE AL, SARR MG, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Is cure possible?[J]. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(3): 456-462. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181613142.
[8]	DEOLIVEIRA ML, WINTER JM, SCHAFER M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(6): 931-937; discussion 937-939. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.
[9]	de WILDE RF, BESSELINK MG, van der TWEEL I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality[J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(3): 404-410. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8664.
[10]	JADAD AR, MOORE RA, CARROLL D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.
[11]	STANG A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.
[12]	AVILES C, HOCKENBERRY M, VROCHIDES D, et al. Perioperative care implementation: Evidence-based practice for patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy using the enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines[J]. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2017, 21(4): 466-472. DOI: 10.1188/17.CJON.466-472.
[13]	DAI J, JIANG Y, FU D. Reducing postoperative complications and improving clinical outcome: Enhanced recovery after surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy—A retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 39: 176-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.089.
[14]	DENG X, CHENG X, HUO Z, et al. Modified protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery is beneficial for Chinese cancer patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(29): 47841-47848. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18092.
[15]	HWANG DW, KIM HJ, LEE JH, et al. Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery program on pancreaticoduodenectomy: A randomized controlled trial[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2019, 26(8): 360-369. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.641.
[16]	KAPRITSOU M, PAPATHANASSOGLOU ED, KONSTANTINOU EA, et al. Effects of the enhanced recovery program on the recovery and stress response in patients with cancer undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Gastroenterol Nurs, 2020, 43(2): 146-155. DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000417.
[17]	KOWALSKY SJ, ZENATI MS, STEVE J, et al. A Combination of robotic approach and ERAS pathway optimizes outcomes and cost for pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(6): 1138-1145. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002707.
[18]	LAVU H, MCCALL NS, WINTER JM, et al. Enhancing patient outcomes while containing costs after complex abdominal operation: A randomized controlled trial of the whipple accelerated recovery pathway[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2019, 228(4): 415-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.032.
[19]	LOF S, BENEDETTI CACCIAGUERRA A, ALJARRAH R, et al. Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery for pancreatoduodenectomy increases the proportion of patients achieving textbook outcome: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Pancreatology, 2020, 20(5): 976-983. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.018.
[20]	PARTELLI S, CRIPPA S, CASTAGNANI R, et al. Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2016, 18(2): 153-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.09.009.
[21]	PINEDA-SOLIS K, BURCHARD PR, RUFFOLO LI, et al. Early prediction of length of stay after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Surg Res, 2021, 260: 499-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.11.060.
[22]	SHAO Z, JIN G, JI W, et al. The role of fast-track surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study of 635 consecutive resections[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 15: 129-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.007.
[23]	SU W, LU F, ZHANG X, et al. A hospital-to-home evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol for elective pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: A cohort study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(41): e8206. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008206.
[24]	TAKAGI K, YOSHIDA R, YAGI T, et al. Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Nutr, 2019, 38(1): 174-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.01.002.
[25]	WILLIAMSSON C, KARLSSON N, STURESSON C, et al. Impact of a fast-track surgery programme for pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2015, 102(9): 1133-1141. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9856.
[26]	ZHU J, LI X, LI H, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways benefit patients with soft pancreatic texture following pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Am J Surg, 2020, 219(6): 1019-1023. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.002.
[27]	ZOUROS E, LIAKAKOS T, MACHAIRAS A, et al. Improvement of gastric emptying by enhanced recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2016, 15(2): 198-208. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60061-9.
[28]	CAO XT, NING CH, LI JR et al. Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative management of pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chin J Gen Surg, 2021, 30(3): 305-312. DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2021.03.008. 曹昕彤, 宁彩虹, 李嘉荣, 等. 快速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术围术期管理中的应用价值[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2021, 30(3): 305-312. DOI: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2021.03.008.
[29]	LI XY, ZHAO X, ZHENG P, et al. Application of enhanced recovery after surgery in patients with duodenopancreatectomy[J]. J Hepatopancreatobiliary Surg, 2016, 28(6): 460-464. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2016.06.004. 李向阳, 赵鑫, 郑鹏, 等. 加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2016, 28(6): 460-464. DOI: 10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2016.06.004.
[30]	LIANG Q. The value of application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative of pancreatoduodenectomy[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2018. 梁琦. 快速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术围术期中的应用价值[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2018.
[31]	JI B, LIU SY, ZHANG W, et al. Clinical effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery strategy for pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35(5): 1032-1036. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.019. 纪柏, 刘松阳, 张威, 等. 加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用效果分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(5): 1032-1036. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.019.
[32]	FAN W, TIAN BL. Application of multi-subjects and multi-modes intervention in the enhanced recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chin J Bases Clin Gen Surg, 2018, 25(6): 695-701. DOI: 10.7507/1007-9424.201710048. 范闻, 田伯乐. 多学科多模式干预在胰十二指肠切除术后快速康复中的应用[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(6): 695-701. DOI: 10.7507/1007-9424.201710048.
[33]	CAI YQ, XIA QH, GAO P, et al. Application value of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2016, 15(6): 552-556. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2016.06.007. 蔡云强, 夏青红, 高攀, 等. 加速康复外科在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中的应用价值[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(6): 552-556. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2016.06.007.
[34]	GOOIKER GA, LEMMENS VE, BESSELINK MG, et al. Impact of centralization of pancreatic cancer surgery on resection rates and survival[J]. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(8): 1000-1005. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9468.
[35]	PASSERI MJ, BAKER EH, SIDDIQUI IA, et al. Total compared with partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of resection margin, readmission rate, and survival from the U.S. National Cancer Database[J]. Curr Oncol, 2019, 26(3): e346-346e356. DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4066.
[36]	MCEVOY SH, LAVELLE LP, HOARE SM, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: expected post-operative anatomy and complications[J]. Br J Radiol, 2014, 87(1041): 20140050. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140050.
[37]	WILMORE DW, KEHLET H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ, 2001, 322(7284): 473-476. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473.
[38]	MAHENDRAN R, TEWARI M, DIXIT VK, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enhances early postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2019, 18(2): 188-193. DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.12.005.
[39]	YERMILOV I, JAIN S, SEKERIS E, et al. Utilization of parenteral nutrition following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is routine jejunostomy tube placement warranted?[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2009, 54(7): 1582-1588. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0526-1.
[40]	HERMSEN JL, SANO Y, KUDSK KA. Food fight! Parenteral nutrition, enteral stimulation and gut-derived mucosal immunity[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2009, 394(1): 17-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-008-0339-x.
[41]	GIANOTTI L, NESPOLI L, TORSELLI L, et al. Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2011, 26(6): 747-753. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011-1138-3.
[42]	YIP VS, DUNNE DF, SAMUELS S, et al. Adherence to early mobilisation: Key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2016, 42(10): 1561-1567. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.015.
[43]	NELSON R, EDWARDS S, TSE B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, 3: CD004929. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004929.pub3.
[44]	ERAS Compliance Group. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: Results from an international registry[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 261(6): 1153-1159. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001029.
[45]	COOLSEN MM, van DAM RM, van der WILT AA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(8): 1909-1918. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2044-3.