加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用效果分析

纪柏; 刘松阳; 张威; 王英超; 刘亚辉

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.019

加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用效果分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.05.019

吉林大学第一医院肝胆胰外二科

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81802805)；

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 1645
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 319
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-12-05
- 出版日期: 2019-05-20

Clinical effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery strategy for pancreaticoduodenectomy

Second Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University

Research funding:

摘要

摘要: 目的评估加速康复外科（ERAS）策略在行胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期中的安全性和有效性。方法选取2012年8月-2016年7月于吉林大学第一医院实施胰十二指肠切除术100例患者的临床资料。将患者按照不同的围手术期管理模式分为ERAS组（n=50）和对照组（n=50）,其中对照组进行常规管理,ERAS组应用ERAS策略。比较两组患者病死率、并发症发生率、手术时间、进食情况、肠道功能、术后住院时间、住院费用、二次手术干预情况以及再次入院率等。计量资料两组比较采用t检验;计数资料2组比较采用χ2检验或Fisher精确概率法。结果 3例患者术后死亡,其中对照组2例,ERAS组1例。两组患者病死率、再手术率及再入院率方面差异均无统计学意义（P值均> 0. 05）。ERAS组术后并发症发生率明显低于对照组（31. 0%vs 56. 3%,χ2=5. 84,P=0. 016）; ERAS组排气时间、进食时间、下地活动时间及拔除引流管时间均明显早于对照组（P值均<0. 001）;两组总住院时间[（14. 3±1. 2） d vs （18. 5±1...
- 胰十二指肠切除术 /
- 加速康复外科 /
- 围手术期医护
Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect and safety of the enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS) strategy in the perioperative period of pancreaticoduodenectomy ( PD) . Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 100 patients who underwent PD in The First Hospital of Jilin University from August 2012 to July 2016. The patients were divided into ERAS group and control group according to the management mode during the perioperative period, with 50 patients in each group. The patients in the control group were given routine management, and those in the ERAS group were given ERAS management. The two groups were compared in terms of mortality rate, incidence rate of complications, time of operation, diet, intestinal function, length of postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs, secondary surgical intervention, and readmission rate. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. Results Two patients in the control group and one in the ERAS group died after surgery. There were no significant differences in mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates between the two groups ( all P > 0. 05) . Compared with the control group, the ERAS group had a significantly lower incidence rate of complications ( 31. 0% vs 56. 3%, χ2= 5. 84, P = 0. 016) and significantly shorter time to first flatus, time to diet, time to ambulation, and time to removal of drainage tube and other tubes ( all P < 0. 001) . There were significant differences between the ERAS group and the control group in length of hospital stay ( 14. 3 ± 1. 2 d vs 18. 5 ± 1. 8 d, t = 13. 73, P < 0. 001) and total hospital costs [10. 7 ± 1. 4 ten thousand yuan vs 13. 2 ± 4. 1 ten thousand yuan, t = 4. 08, P < 0. 001]. Conclusion The ERAS strategy is safe and effective in the perioperative period of PD and can significantly reduce hospital costs, shorten the length of hospital stay, standardize perioperative management, diminish clinical variability, and thus help patients to achieve enhanced recovery. Therefore, it holds promise for clinical application.
- pancreaticoduodenectomy /
- enhanced recovery after surgery /
- perioperative care

HTML全文

参考文献(15)

[1] WANG X, DONG X, FANG XD. Preventive treatment of disease thought combined with accelerated surgical rehabilitation model in the nursing of advanced gastric cancer in old age[J]. J Changchun Univ Chin Med, 2018, 34 (5) :942-944, 960. (in Chinese) 王雪, 董雪, 房学东.中医治未病思想联合加速康复外科模式在老年进展期胃癌护理中的应用[J].长春中医药大学学报, 2018, 34 (5) :942-944, 960.

[2] WANG G, GAO Y, JIANG ZW, et al. Effect of fast tract surgery on immune function after laparoscopic colorectal resection[J]. Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2012, 19 (1) :3-7. (in Chinese) 王刚, 高勇, 江志伟, 等.结直肠癌病人用加速康复外科理念行腹腔镜手术对机体免疫功能的影响[J].肠外与肠内营养, 2012, 19 (1) :3-7.

[3] BASSI C, MARCHEGIANI G, DERVENIS C, et al. The 2016update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula:11 Years After[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161 (3) :584-591.

[4] ANDRIANELLO S, MARCHEGIANI G, MALLEO G, et al. Biliary fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy:Data from 1618consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. HPB (Oxford) , 2017, 19 (3) :264-269.

[5] COURVOISIER T, DONATINI G, FAURE JP. Primary versus secondary delayed gastric emptying (DGE) grades B and C of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery after pancreatoduodenectomy:A retrospective analysis on a group of 132 patients[J]. Updates Surg, 2015, 67 (3) :305-309.

[6] LI WN, YANG G, LI JD, et al. Safety of fast track surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy:A Meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2017, 33 (1) :121-125. (in Chinese) 李伟男, 杨刚, 李敬东, 等.加速康复外科在胰十二指肠切除术中应用安全性评价的Meta分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33 (1) :121-125.

[7] PÖPPING DM, ELIA N, VAN AKEN HK, et al. Impact of epidural analgesia on mortality and morbidity after surgery:Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259 (6) :1056-1067.

[8] BASSI C, MOLINARI E, MALLEO G, et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections:Results of a prospective randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2010, 252 (2) :207-214.

[9] TAKAGI K, YOSHIDA R, YAGI T, et al. Effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy:A randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Nutr, 2019, 38 (1) :174-181.

[10] YANG YM, TIAN XD. The feasibility of enhance recovery after surgery in pancreatic surgery[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2018, 17 (7) :659-662. (in Chinese) 杨尹默, 田孝东.胰腺外科开展加速康复外科的可行性评价[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17 (7) :659-662.

[11] REN CY, BAI T, CUI W, et al. Safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery in perioperative management of pancreatectomy:A Meta analysis[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2018, 17 (7) :729-739. (in Chinese) 任超逸, 白同, 崔巍, 等.加速康复外科应用于胰腺切除围术期安全性和可行性的Meta分析[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17 (7) :729-739.

[12] KEHLET H, WILMORE DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183 (6) :630-641.

[13] China Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Group of Chinese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Chinese consensus of enhanced recovery after surgery for colorectal surgery (2015) [J]. Chin J Gastrointestinal Surg, 2015, 18 (8) :785-787. (in Chinese) 中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会加速康复外科协作组.结直肠手术应用加速康复外科中国专家共识 (2015版) [J].中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18 (8) :785-787.

[14] XU X, ZHENG C, ZHAO Y, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery for pancreaticoduodenectomy:Review of current evidence and trends[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 50:79-86.

[15] MAHENDRAN R, TEWARI M, DIXIT VK, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enhances early postoperative recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018.[Epub ahead of print]

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计