中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 38 Issue 9
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Prognostic value of several immune and inflammatory indices after curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.09.021
Research funding:

Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province (202004011537);

Weifang Science and Technology Development Program(Medical Science) (2020YX085);

Medical Research and Development Fund—Clinical and Basic Research Project (TB205004)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LI Shiping, lishipingwyfy@126.com(ORCID: 0000-0001-9144-0180)
  • Received Date: 2022-03-06
  • Accepted Date: 2022-04-18
  • Published Date: 2022-09-20
  •   Objective  To investigate the value of different immune and inflammatory indices in predicting the survival outcome of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after curative-intent resection.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the case data of 122 patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent resection in Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017 to analyze the correlation of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), prognostic inflammation index (PII), inflammation score (IS), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) with the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival of ICC patients after surgery, and the value of the above indices in predicting prognosis was evaluated. The chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves, and the Log-rank test was used for comparison between groups; the Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses, and hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval [CI] were calculated.  Results  The univariate survival analysis showed that NLR (HR=2.212, P=0.004), LMR (HR=0.403, P=0.012), PII (HR=3.013, P < 0.001), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (HR=0.530, P=0.019), IS (HR=1.809, P=0.001), SII (HR=2.107, P=0.002), and SIS (HR=2.225, P < 0.001) were predictive factors for postoperative DFS of patients with ICC, and NLR (HR=2.416, P=0.009), LMR (HR=0.297, P=0.008), PII (HR=3.288, P < 0.001), PNI (HR=0.292, P=0.003), IS (HR=2.048, P=0.002), SII (HR=1.839, P=0.049), and SIS (HR=2.335, P < 0.001) were predictive factors for postoperative OS of patients with ICC. The multivariate survival analysis showed that high levels of PII (HR=2.146, P=0.035) and SIS (HR=2.511, P < 0.001) were independent influencing factors for postoperative DFS of ICC patients, and high levels of PII (HR=2.981, P=0.009), PNI (HR=0.261, P=0.002), and SIS (HR=2.294, P=0.010) were independent influencing factors for postoperative OS. The patients with a high level of PII tended to have advanced tumor T stage (χ2=8.777, P=0.003) and M stage (P=0.029), and the patients with high-grade SIS tended to have advanced N stage (χ2=9.985, P=0.030) and M stage (χ2=8.574, P=0.012).  Conclusion  Among the various inflammation indices, PII and SIS are recommended for preoperative stratification and prediction of the outcome of ICC patients after curative-intent resection.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BERGQUIST A, von SETH E. Epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2015, 29(2): 221-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2015.02.003.
    [2]
    TAN JC, COBURN NG, BAXTER NN, et al. Surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-a population-based study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2008, 15(2): 600-608. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9627-x.
    [3]
    SI A, LI J, YANG Z, et al. Impact of anatomical versus non-anatomical liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2019, 26(6): 1841-1850. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07260-8.
    [4]
    WANG DS, LUO HY, QIU MZ, et al. Comparison of the prognostic values of various inflammation based factors in patients with pancreatic cancer[J]. Med Oncol, 2012, 29(5): 3092-3100. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0226-8.
    [5]
    KINOSHITA A, ONODA H, IMAI N, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Br J Cancer, 2012, 107(6): 988-993. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.354.
    [6]
    LIN J, FANG T, ZHU M, et al. Comparative performance of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients operated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019, 11: 9107-9119. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S198959.
    [7]
    CHEN Q, DAI Z, YIN D, et al. Negative impact of preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio on outcome after hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(13): e574. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000574.
    [8]
    OHIRA M, YOSHIZUMI T, YUGAWA K, et al. Association of inflammatory biomarkers with long-term outcomes after curative surgery for mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Surg Today, 2020, 50(4): 379-388. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01905-7.
    [9]
    MA B, MENG H, SHEN A, et al. Prognostic value of inflammatory and tumour markers in small-duct subtype intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2021, 2021: 6616062. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6616062.
    [10]
    ZHANG Y, SHI SM, YANG H, et al. Systemic inflammation score predicts survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative resection[J]. J Cancer, 2019, 10(2): 494-503. DOI: 10.7150/jca.26890.
    [11]
    SELLERS CM, UHLIG J, LUDWIG JM, et al. Inflammatory markers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Effects of advanced liver disease[J]. Cancer Med, 2019, 8(13): 5916-5929. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2373.
    [12]
    CANNA K, MCARDLE PA, MCMILLAN DC, et al. The relationship between tumour T-lymphocyte infiltration, the systemic inflammatory response and survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 2005, 92(4): 651-654. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602419.
    [13]
    MA B, MENG H, TIAN Y, et al. High expression of HVEM is associated with improved prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Oncol Lett, 2021, 21(1): 69. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12330.
    [14]
    ZHOU SL, DAI Z, ZHOU ZJ, et al. CXCL5 contributes to tumor metastasis and recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by recruiting infiltrative intratumoral neutrophils[J]. Carcinogenesis, 2014, 35(3): 597-605. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt397.
    [15]
    MA B, MENG H, TIAN Y, et al. Distinct clinical and prognostic implication of IDH1/2 mutation and other most frequent mutations in large duct and small duct subtypes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 318. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06804-6.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (354) PDF downloads(51) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return