中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 38 Issue 3
Mar.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Population differences of metabolic associated fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease based on a community elderly population

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2022.03.011
Research funding:

Research Project of Beijing Research Association for Chronic Diseases Control and Health Education (BJMB0012021025002)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Yali, ericliudoc@ccmu.edu.cn(ORCID:0000-0002-1249-6010); ZHANG Jing, zjyouan@ccmu.edu.cn(ORCID:0000-0002-3082-8330)
  • Received Date: 2021-08-03
  • Accepted Date: 2021-09-09
  • Published Date: 2022-03-20
  •   Objective  To investigate the population differences of the newly named "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) and the former name "nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD).  Methods  From November 2020 to January 2021, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 624 elderly individuals aged above 65 years in a community in Beijing, China, and related data were collected, including demographic data, past history, laboratory markers, liver ultrasound, and liver elasticity. According to the presence or absence of fatty liver based on ultrasonic diagnosis, the individuals were divided into fatty liver group with 389 individuals and non-fatty liver group with 235 individuals. The independent samples t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between the two groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between the two groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between the two groups.  Results  Among the 389 patients with fatty liver, 387(99.5%) were diagnosed with MAFLD and 368(94.6%) were diagnosed with NAFLD, and there were 19 patients with a history of heavy alcohol consumption and 2 with positive surface antigen. A total of 366 patients met the diagnostic criteria for both MAFLD and NAFLD, accounting for 94.6% of the MAFLD patients and 99.5% of the NAFLD patients. Compared with the non-fatty liver group, the MAFLD group had significant increases in body mass index (BMI) (t=-11.228, P < 0.05), waist circumference (Z=-8.532, P < 0.05), hip circumference (Z=-6.449, P < 0.05), waist-hip ratio (Z=-5.708, P < 0.05), alanine aminotransferase (Z=-5.027, P < 0.05), aspartate aminotransferase (Z=-2.880, P < 0.05), platelet count (t=-3.623, P < 0.05), triglyceride (Z=-8.489, P < 0.05), fasting blood glucose (Z=-3.516, P < 0.05), HbA1c (Z=-2.884, P < 0.05), Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (Z=-0.394, P < 0.05), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Z=-4.912, P < 0.05), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) (t=13.744, P < 0.05), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (Z=-7.69, P < 0.05), as well as a significant reduction in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (t=6.348, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, MAFLD patients had more metabolic associated diseases, such as overweight, obesity, central obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (χ2=9.978, 65.472, 36.571, 9.797, and 5.128, all P < 0.05). In the MAFLD group, 30.7% of the patients had non-obese fatty liver disease (BMI < 25 kg/m2), and 11.1% had lean fatty liver disease (BMI < 23 kg/m2); compared with the obese MAFLD patients, the non-obese MAFLD patients had significantly lower age (Z=-3.042, P < 0.05), BMI (Z=-15.705, P < 0.05), waist circumference (Z=-9.589, P < 0.05), hip circumference (Z=-10.275, P < 0.05), HOMA-IR (Z=-2.081, P < 0.05), CAP (t=-3.468, P < 0.05), LSM (Z=-3.630, P < 0.05), and NAFLD fibrosis score (t=-4.433, P < 0.05). According to LSM value, advanced liver fibrosis accounted for 3.6% of the MAFLD population, and 10% of the MAFLD population could not be excluded for advanced liver fibrosis.  Conclusion  The diagnosis of MAFLD can basically cover the NAFLD population in the elderly people, and it is supposed that MAFLD can almost directly replace the concept of NAFLD in similar populations. However, further studies are needed to investigate its application in other populations.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ESLAM M, SANYAL AJ, GEORGE J. MAFLD: A consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(7): 1999-2014. e1. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.312.
    [2]
    LIN S, HUANG J, WANG M, et al. Comparison of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnostic criteria in real world[J]. Liver Int, 2020, 40(9): 2082-2089. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14548.
    [3]
    ESLAM M, NEWSOME PN, SARIN SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73(1): 202-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039.
    [4]
    Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association. Consensus on the diagnosis and therapy of hepatic fibrosis(2019)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35(10): 2163-2172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.10.007.

    中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会消化病学分会, 中华医学会感染病学分会. 肝纤维化诊断及治疗共识(2019年)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35(10): 2163-2172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.10.007.
    [5]
    NEWSOME PN, CRAMB R, DAVISON SM, et al. Guidelines on the management of abnormal liver blood tests[J]. Gut, 2018, 67(1): 6-19. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314924.
    [6]
    NAN Y, AN J, BAO J, et al. The Chinese Society of Hepatology position statement on the redefinition of fatty liver disease[J]. J Hepatol, 2021, 75(2): 454-461. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.05.003.
    [7]
    WONG VW, WONG GL, WOO J, et al. Impact of the new definition of metabolic associated fatty liver disease on the epidemiology of the disease[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 19(10): 2161-2171. e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.046.
    [8]
    YAMAMURA S, ESLAM M, KAWAGUCHI T, et al. MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than NAFLD[J]. Liver Int, 2020, 40(12): 3018-3030. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14675.
    [9]
    YE Q, ZOU B, YEO YH, et al. Global prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of non-obese or lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(8): 739-752. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30077-7.
    [10]
    LI YY, XIE ZY. Advances in the etiology and treatment of non-obese nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2021, 37(2): 452-457. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.02.043.

    李洋洋, 谢正元. 非肥胖型非酒精性脂肪性肝病的病因及治疗进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2021, 37(2): 452-457. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.02.043.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (444) PDF downloads(79) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return