Application of optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic surgery after previous abdominal surgery

Xiang'an WU; Yue SHI; Xueshuai WAN; Jue WANG; Yuke ZHANG; Bao JIN; Xiao LIU; Haifeng XU; Yongchang ZHENG; Xin LU; Yilei MAO; Xinting SANG; Shunda DU

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.024

Volume 37 Issue 10

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Clinical Hepatology > 2021 > 37(10): 2380-2383

PDF( 2199 KB)

Application of optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic surgery after previous abdominal surgery

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.024

a.
Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
b.
Department of Operating Room, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China

Research funding:

CAMS Initiative of Innovative Medicine (CAMS-2017-I2M-4-002);

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972698);

Chen Xiao-ping Foundation for the Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Porvince (CXPJJH11900001-2019215)

Received Date: 2021-03-04
Accepted Date: 2021-05-31
Published Date: 2021-10-20

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To investigate the value of optical trocar insertion technique in establishing pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery after previous abdominal surgery. Methods A total of 29 patients, with a history of abdominal surgery, who planned to undergo laparoscopic liver surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into optical trocar insertion group and open approach group. The independent samples t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups; the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of ranked data between groups. Results There were no procedure-related complications in either group. Compared with the open approach group, the optical trocar insertion group had a significantly shorter time required to establish pneumoperitoneum [35.00 (21.00-46.00) seconds vs 180.00 (152.50-252.50) seconds, U=0, P < 0.001] and a significantly smaller incision length [1.10(1.00-1.20) cm vs 2.80(2.45-3.00) cm, U=0, P < 0.001]. Conclusion Both optical trocar insertion and open approach for establishing pneumoperitoneum is relatively safe in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver surgery after previous abdominal surgery, while optical trocar insertion has the advantages of high efficiency and minimal invasiveness in establishing pneumoperitoneum.
- Laparoscopy,
- Tissue Adhesions,
- Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	CAI X. Laparoscopic liver resection: The current status and the future[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2018, 7(2): 98-104. DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.02.07.
[2]	WANG J, CHEN QW, ZHENG GR, et al. Evolution and development of surgical treatment for liver cancer[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(10): 2161-2166. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.10.001. 王捷, 陈茄威, 郑国荣, 等. 肝癌外科治疗的演变与发展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(10): 2161-2166. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.10.001.
[3]	PENG L, CAO J, HU X, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2019, 65: 96-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.03.021.
[4]	JIN B, DU S, XU H, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for patients who received enterostomy[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2019, 15(4): 325-330. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_78_18.
[5]	URANUES S, OZKAN OV, TOMASCH G. Safe and easy access technique for the first trocar in laparoscopic surgery[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2016, 401(6): 909-912. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1474-4.
[6]	OKABAYASHI K, ASHRAFIAN H, ZACHARAKIS E, et al. Adhesions after abdominal surgery: A systematic review of the incidence, distribution and severity[J]. Surg Today, 2014, 44(3): 405-420. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-013-0591-8.
[7]	TEN BROEK R, STOMMEL M, STRIK C, et al. Benefits and harms of adhesion barriers for abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9911): 48-59. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61687-6.
[8]	LEVRANT SG, BIEBER E, BARNES R. Risk of anterior abdominal wall adhesions increases with number and type of previous laparotomy[J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 1994, 1(4, Part 2): s19. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80928-4.
[9]	AZEVEDO JL, AZEVEDO OC, MIYAHIRA SA, et al. Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: A systematic literature review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(7): 1428-1432. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0383-9.
[10]	BIANCHI G, MARTORANA E, GHAITH A, et al. Laparoscopic access overview: Is there a safest entry method?[J]. Actas Urol Esp, 2016, 40(6): 386-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2015.11.011.
[11]	ZHAO ML. Clinical study on prevention of abdominal adhesion after abdominal surgery[J]. Systems Med, 2019, 4(9): 93-95. DOI: 10.19368/j.cnki.2096-1782.2019.09.093. 赵美良. 腹部手术后腹腔粘连预防的临床研究[J]. 系统医学, 2019, 4(9): 93-95. DOI: 10.19368/j.cnki.2096-1782.2019.09.093.
[12]	LIANG SJ. A comparative study of abdominal adhesion after laparotomy versus laparoscopic surgery[J]. Med Innov Chin, 2012, 9(22): 116-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2012.22.072. 梁世杰. 开腹与腔镜手术后腹腔粘连程度的临床对比研究[J]. 中国医学创新, 2012, 9(22): 116-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2012.22.072.
[13]	PHILIPS PA, AMARAL JF. Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2001, 192(4): 525-536. DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00768-2.
[14]	SUNDBOM M, OTTOSSON J. Trocar injuries in 17, 446 laparoscopic gastric bypass-a nationwide survey from the scandinavian obesity surgery registry[J]. Obes Surg, 2016, 26(9): 2127-2130. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-016-2080-9.
[15]	TINELLI A, MALVASI A, GUIDO M, et al. Laparoscopy entry in patients with previous abdominal and pelvic surgery[J]. Surg Innov, 2011, 18(3): 201-205. DOI: 10.1177/1553350610393989.
[16]	MOHAMMADI M, SHAKIBA B, SHIRANI M. Comparison of two methods of laparoscopic trocar insertion (Hasson and Visiport) in terms of speed and complication in urologic surgery[J]. Biomedicine (Taipei), 2018, 8(4): 22. DOI: 10.1051/bmdcn/2018080422.
[17]	NUNES-SILVA I, HIDAKA A, BARRIOS C, et al. Pure retroperitoneal optical access trocar for lumbar diseases in adults: A step-by-step technique[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2018, 28(3): 159-163. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000533.
[18]	TANAKA C, FUJIWARA M, KANDA M, et al. Optical trocar access for initial trocar placement in laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery: A propensity score-matching analysis[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2019, 12(1): 37-42. DOI: 10.1111/ases.12484.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(2) / Tables(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (694) PDF downloads(24)

Application of optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic surgery after previous abdominal surgery

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.024

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Application of optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic surgery after previous abdominal surgery

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2021.10.024

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

About Journal

Submission Guideline

Journal Online

Hepatobiliary College

Guidelines

Export File

Citation

Format

Content