中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 7
Jul.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of single metastatic liver cancer and solitary necrotic nodule of the liver

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2016.07.025
Research funding:

 

  • Published Date: 2016-07-20
  • Objective To investigate the value of contrast- enhanced ultrasound( CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of single metastatic hepatic carcinoma( MHC) and solitary necrotic nodule of the liver( SNNL). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 12 patients with single MHC and 16 patients with SNNL who showed circular enhancement in arterial phase on CEUS. Age,size of lesion,and findings of two- dimensional gray- scale ultrasound and CEUS were compared between the two groups. The two- independent- samples t-test was used for comparison between groups,and the paired t- test was used for comparison within each group. Results The MHC group had a significantly higher mean age than the SNNL group( 60. 2 ± 11. 3 years vs 41. 0 ± 9. 1 years,t = 4. 970,P < 0. 001). The mean diameter of lesion was 2. 86 ± 1. 22 cm in the MHC group and 2. 97 ± 0. 96 cm in the SNNL group,and showed no significant difference between the two groups( t =- 0. 269,P = 0. 790). In the MHC group,the lesions had complex and uneven echoes and blurred boundaries,while in the SNNL group,most lesions were in the right lobe and were hypoechoic with clear boundaries. No blood flow signals were detected on CDFI in these two groups. Both groups had circular enhancement around the lesions in arterial phase on CEUS,and the mean thickness showed a significant difference between the MHC group and the SNNL group( 5. 00 ± 1. 69 mm vs 2. 37 ± 0. 87 mm,t = 5. 374,P < 0. 001). In the MHC group,the area in lesions without enhancement in delayed phase was significantly larger than that in arterial phase( t =- 4. 508,P =0. 001),while in the SNNL group,the area in lesions without enhancement showed no significant difference between delayed phase and arterial phase( t =- 0. 449,P = 0. 660). Conclusion The thickness of circular enhancement in arterial phase on CEUS and the presence or absence of the enlargement in the area without enhancement contributes to the differential diagnosis of single MHC and SNNL.

     

  • loading
  • [1]CAO YM,TANG SS.Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for solitary necrotic nodule of the liver[J].J Clin Hepatol,2015,31(8):1307-1310.(in Chinese)曹玉敏,唐少珊.超声造影对肝脏孤立性坏死结节的诊断价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(8):1307-1310.
    [2]NI XX,ZHOU HY,WEI XD,et al.Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of solitary necrotic liver nodule[J/CD].Chin J Med Ultrasound:Electronic Edition,2011,8(7):1451-1456.(in Chinese)倪晓霞,周环宇,魏向东,等.肝脏孤立性坏死结节的超声造影表现[J/CD].中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2011,8(7):1451-1456.
    [3]WANG JY,WU RLQ,PANG F,et al.Performance of contrastenhanced ultrasound in metastatic cancer of liver and its clinical application[J].J Inner Mongolia Med Univ,2015,37(1):20-28.(in Chinese)王金岩,乌日丽其,庞芳,等.转移性肝癌的超声造影特征及价值[J].内蒙古医科大学学报,2015,37(1):20-28.
    [4]DUAN XH,QIAN Y,DENG ZL,et al.Application of real-time harmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal lesion in the liver[J].Guide China Med,2013,11(15):158-160.(in Chinese)段学慧,钱毅,邓志兰,等.实时谐波超声造影在肝局灶性病变中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(15):158-160.
    [5]SHANG GD,LIU JD,LI FM,et al.Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of malignant liver tumors[J].Chin Primary Health Care,2015,29(5):137-138.(in Chinese)尚国栋,刘俊德,李付民,等.超声造影在肝脏恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用价值[J].中国初级卫生保健,2015,29(5):137-138.
    [6]WANG XM.Application of color Doppler contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver tumors[J].Guide China Med,2013,11(2):472-473.(in Chinese)王晓明.彩色多普勒超声造影在肝肿瘤中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(2):472-473.
    [7]YU S,FANG ZT,BAO Q,et al.MRI features and pathology correlation of hepatic solitary necrotic nodules[J].Chin J Med imaging,2013,21(9):641-643.(in Chinese)俞顺,方主亭,包强,等.肝脏孤立性坏死结节的MRI特征与病理对照[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(9):641-643.
    [8]HUANG ZP,WANG P,ZHENG RQ,et al.Comparison of the detective capability of focal liver lesion between conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound[J/CD].Chin J Hepatic Surg:Electronic Edition,2013,2(4):29-33.(in Chinese)黄泽萍,王平,郑荣琴,等.常规超声检查与超声造影对肝脏局灶性病变检出能力的比较[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2013,2(4):29-33.
    [9]ZHANG XL,YANG J.Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of liver malignant tumor[J].Chin JUltrasound in Med,2010,26(10):928-931.(in Chinese)张学兰,杨洁.超声造影在肝恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中国超声医学杂志,2010,26(10):928-931.
    [10]CELLI N,GAIANI S,PISCAQLIA F,et al.Characterization of liver lesions by real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J].Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2007,19(1):3-14.
    [11] STEEG PS.Tumor metastasis:mechanistic insights and clinical challenges[J].Nat Med,2006,12(8):895-904.
    [12] INOUE T,KUDO M,MAENISHI O,et al.Value of liver parenchymal phase contrast-enhanced sonography to diagnose premalignant and borderline lesions and overt hepatocellular carcinoma[J].AJR Am J Roentqenol,2009,192(3):698-705.
    [13]CHENG W,HUANG DZ.Atypical ultrasound findings and pathological basis of malignant liver tumors[J].Curr Physician,2009,15(19):24-25.(in Chinese)程文,黄道中.肝脏恶性肿瘤超声造影不典型表现及相关病理基础[J].当代医学,2009,15(19):24-25.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1961) PDF downloads(392) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return