中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 12
Dec.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Comparison of endoscopic variceal ligation and pericardial devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.12.012
  • Received Date: 2014-05-16
  • Published Date: 2014-12-20
  • Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus pericardial devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension. Methods The clinical data of 101 cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage from January2010 to January 2012 were analyzed. Fifty-three patients received endoscopic variceal ligation, and forty-eight patients received pericardial devascularization. Postoperative changes in liver function and hypersplenism were compared between the two groups. The rate of rehaemorrhagia and incidence of postoperative complications after surgery were compared as well. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD, and categorical data were expressed as number of cases or percentage. Comparison of continuous data between the two groups was made by independent-samples t test, and comparison of categorical data was made by chi-square test. Results After surgery, the variceal ligation group showed no significant changes in liver reserve function, while the albumin level was significantly decreased in the pericardial devascularization group (t =2. 512, P < 0. 05) . There were no significant changes in the counts of white blood cells and platelets in the endoscopic variceal ligation group after surgery (P > 0. 05) , but significant increases in the counts of white blood cells and platelets were detected in the pericardial devascularization group (P < 0. 05) . The rates of postoperative haemorrhage in the two groups were: 3 months, 7. 5% vs 6. 2% (χ2= 0. 066, P > 0. 05) , 6 months, 7. 5% vs 8. 3% (χ2= 0. 021, P > 0. 05) , and 1 year, 9. 4% vs 8. 3% (χ2= 0. 038, P > 0. 05) . The incidence rates of postoperative complications in the two groups were 24. 5% and 50%, respectively (χ2= 7. 040, P < 0. 05) . Conclusion Compared with pericardial devascularization, endoscopic variceal ligation causes fewer microlesions, preserves liver function, and leads to a lower incidence of postoperative complications. However, if hypersplenism is observed in the cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage, pericardial devascularization can be used to control the hypersplenism and prevent esophageal hemorrhage.

     

  • loading
  • [1]LIN XX, LIN CJ, LI J, et al.Value of liver reserve function in evaluation of hemorrbage risk and prognosis of cirrhosis with esophogeal varices bleeding[J].J Med Res, 2014, 43 (1) :84-88. (in Chinese) 林晓晓, 林春景, 李佳, 等.肝储备功能对肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血风险及预后的评估价值[J].医学研究杂志, 2014, 43 (1) :84-88.
    [2]LI ZW, ZHANG PR, ZHANG SK.Disputes in devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2013, 12 (11) :823-826. (in Chinese) 李志伟, 张培瑞, 张绍康.门静脉高压症断流术的争议[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12 (11) :823-826.
    [3]CASELITZ M, MASCHE N, FLEMMING P, et al.Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma according to new staging classifications[J].Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2004, 129 (33) :1725-1730.
    [4]RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ F, GROSZMANN RJ.Pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension[J].Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2002, 21 (1) :15-40.
    [5]XU JF, YIN YF, LUO SQ.The history and future of Sugiura operation[J].Chin J Hepatol, 2013, 21 (4) :245-248. (in Chinese) 许继凡, 殷永芳, 罗诗樵.经胸和经腹门奇静脉断流术的历史地位及未来[J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2013, 21 (4) :245-248.
    [6]GARCIA-TSAO G, SANYAL AJ, GRACE ND, et al.Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varicesand variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2007, 102 (9) :2086-2102.
    [7]LIN W, LIU XJ, JIANG GJ, et al.Comparison among endoscopic variceal slerotheropy, endoscopic variceal slerotheropy with sequentia I endoscopic variceal ligation plus endoscopic variceal slerotheropy, and endoscopic variceal ligation plus endoscopic vanceal slerotheropy for esophageal varicosis[J].World Chin J Dig, 2007, 15 (9) :1020-1023. (in Chinese) 蔺武, 刘心娟, 姜国俊, 等.EVS、EVS+EVL续贯EVS和EVL续贯EVS治疗食管静脉曲张的疗效比较[J].世界华人消化杂志, 2007, 15 (9) :1020-1023.
    [8]LI BM, ZHU X, SHU X, et al.Endoscopic variceal ligation plus sclerotherapy for esophageal variceal bleeding[J].Chin J Dig Endosc, 2013, 30 (2) :67-70. (in Chinese) 李弼民, 朱萱, 舒徐, 等.肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血序贯治疗的临床应用价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志, 2013, 30 (2) :67-70.
    [9]LYU Y, LI MX, LIU XM, et al.Risk factors for recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage after splenectomy plus periardial devascularization for patients with portal hypertension[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2013, 12 (11) :827-831. (in Chinese) 吕毅, 李慕行, 刘学民, 等.门静脉高压症脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后消化道再出血的危险因素分析[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12 (11) :827-831.
    [10]SUN Q, ZHENG Z.Comparision of efficacy of emergency operation versus selective operation for massive upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to portal hyperension[J].J Clin Surg, 2013, 21 (6) :439-440. (in Chinese) 孙强, 郑正.急诊与择期手术治疗门静脉高压症上消化道大出血的比较[J].临床外科杂志, 2013, 21 (6) :439-440.
    [11]LIU C, XU J, JI YC, et al.A comparative study between handassisted laparoscopic splenectomy and open splenectomy in combination with pericardial devascularization to treat portal hypertension[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2011, 17 (4) :285-288. (in Chinese) 刘昶, 许军, 纪艳超, 等.手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除、贲门周围血管离断术的临床分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2011, 17 (4) :285-288.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2559) PDF downloads(573) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return