中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 10
Oct.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Application of hepatectomy without hepatic blood flow occlusion in treatment of primary liver cancer

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.10.021
  • Received Date: 2014-02-11
  • Published Date: 2014-10-20
  • Objective To investigate the effects of hepatectomy without hepatic blood flow occlusion ( HBFO) on the liver function and postoperative recovery in patients with primary liver cancer. Methods Eighty patients with primary liver cancer who underwent hepatectomy in our hospital from June 2010 to June 2013 were divided into three groups: first porta hepatis control ( Pringle) group ( n = 24) , hemihepatic vascular control ( HVC) group ( n = 24) , and non-HBFO group ( n = 32) . The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative liver function, surgical complications, and postoperative length of hospital stay were compared between the three groups. Categorical data were analyzed by chi-square test, and continuous data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Dunnett-t for multiple comparisons. Results There were no significant differences in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the three groups ( F = 2. 45 and 0. 34, P > 0. 05 for both) . The recovery of serum total bilirubin ( TBil) and alanine aminotransferase ( ALT) at 1 and 7 d after operation was significantly better in the non-HBFO group ( 1 d, TBil: 22. 4 ± 9. 4 μmol /L, ALT: 287. 4 ± 165. 7 U /L; 7 d, TBil: 17. 1 ± 6. 6 μmol /L, ALT: 86. 2 ± 54. 5 U /L) than in the Pringle group ( 1 d, TBil: 33. 5 ± 11. 9 μmol /L, ALT: 429. 5 ± 137. 8 U /L; 7 d, TBil: 24. 5 ± 7. 0 μmol /L, ALT: 145. 5 ± 43. 6 U /L) and HVC group ( 1d, TBil: 29. 1 ± 8. 3 μmol /L, ALT: 390. 2 ± 176. 6 U /L; 7d, TBil: 21. 5 ± 7. 5 μmol /L, ALT: 121. 5 ± 56. 8 U /L) ( P<0. 05 for all) . The recovery of serum albumin ( Alb) at 1 d after operation was significantly better in the non-HBFO group ( 29. 3 ± 2. 8 g /L) than in the Pringle group ( 27. 3 ± 3. 3 g /L) ( P < 0. 05) , but it showed no significant difference between the non-HBFO group and HVC group ( 29. 3 ± 2. 8 g /L vs 27. 8 ± 2. 5 g /L, P >0. 05) ; there were no significant differences in the recovery of serum Alb at 7 d after operation between the three groups ( P > 0. 05) . The postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the non-HBFO group ( 10. 3 ± 2. 1d) than in the Pringle group ( 12. 7 ± 2. 6 d) and HVC group ( 12. 0 ± 2. 2 d) ( P < 0. 05) . Conclusion Compared with Pringle maneuver and HVC, non-HBFO would not increase the intraoperative blood loss and operation time and leads to milder liver function damage and more rapid postoperative recovery in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing hepatectomy.

     

  • loading
  • [1]ZHU MH, JIANG YF, YANG YH.Clinical application of isolated pulmonary metastaseetomy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma postoperative[J].J Med Res, 2013, 42 (5) :117-119. (in Chinese) 祝明华, 江寅芳, 杨运海.肝癌术后孤立性肺转移灶切除术的临床应用[J].医学研究杂志, 2013, 42 (5) :117-119.
    [2]ZHU Y, ZHANG W.Clinical application of absorbable clips in hepatectomy[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2013, 29 (12) :932-935. (in Chinese) 朱宇, 张伟.可吸收夹在肝切除术中的应用[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29 (12) :932-935.
    [3]HUANG ZQ, HUANG XQ.Liver surgical operative surgery[M].Beijing:People’s military medical press, 2007:86-89. (in Chinese) 黄志强, 黄晓强.肝脏外科手术学[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2007:86-89.
    [4]LAU WY, LAI EC, LAU SH.Methods of vascular control technique during liver resection:a comprehensive review[J].Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2010, 9 (5) :473-481.
    [5]KANG FX, LI WM, HE CQ, et al.Application of hemihepatic blood inflow occlusion and total hepatic blood inflow occlusion in hepatic surgery[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2011, 17 (5) :420-421. (in Chinese) 康复笑, 李文美, 何长青, 等.入肝血流半肝阻断与全肝阻断在肝脏手术中应用[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2011, 17 (5) :420-421.
    [6] LI Y, LIU ZJ, GONG JP.Effects of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion on intestinal barrier and bacteria translocation in rats[J].Chin J Organ Transplant, 2007, 28 (3) :150-153. (in Chinese) 李洋, 刘作金, 龚建平.肝缺血-再灌注损伤对大鼠肠黏膜屏障功能及肠道菌群易位的影响[J].中华器官移植杂志, 2007, 28 (3) :150-153.
    [7]SANJAY P, ONG I, BARTLETT A, et al.Meta-analysis of intermittent Pringle manoeuvre versus no Pringle manoeuvre in elective liver surgery[J].ANZ J Surg, 2013, 83 (10) :719-723.
    [8]CAPUSSOTTI L, MURATORE A, FERRERO A, et al.Randomized clinical trial of liver resection with and without hepatic pedicle clamping[J].Br J Surg, 2006, 93 (6) :685-689.
    [9]LEE KF, CHEUNG YS, WONG J, et al.Randomized clinical trial of open hepatectomy with or without intermittent Pringle manoeuvre[J].Br J Surg, 2012, 99 (9) :1203-1209.
    [10]YANG LY, HUANG GW, HUANG JH, et al.Resection of large hepatocellular carcinoma without employment of Pringle maneuver[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2003, 9 (6) :331-333. (in Chinese) 杨连粤, 黄耿文, 黄建华, 等.不阻断肝门的大肝癌切除术[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2003, 9 (6) :331-333.
    [11]QIAN NS, LIAO YH, CAI SW, et al.Comprehensive application of modern technologies in precise liver resection[J].Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2013, 12 (3) :244-250.
    [12]ZHANG ZW.Application of surgical instruments in hepatectomy without hepatic blood flow occlusion[J].Chongqing Med J, 2013, 42 (23) :2804-2815. (in Chinese) 章正威.无血流阻断肝切除手术器械应用[J].重庆医学, 2013, 42 (23) :2804-2815.
    [13]QIU FN, WANG YD, TIAN YF, et al.Hemihepatectomy using ultrasonic knife:a report of 31 cases[J].J Qiqihar Univ Med, 2010, 31 (20) :3269-3270. (in Chinese) 邱福南, 王耀东, 田毅峰, 等.31例超声刀规则性半肝切除术[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2010, 31 (20) :3269-3270.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2617) PDF downloads(543) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return