中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Issue 9
Sep.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Clinical effects of comprehensive treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria: a comparative study

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.09.019
Research funding:

 

  • Received Date: 2014-01-21
  • Published Date: 2014-09-20
  • Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of comprehensive treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinomas ( HCC) exceeding Milan criteria. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 157 patients with HCC ( exceeding Milan criteria) who received comprehensive treatment ( 99 patients, including 48 cases meeting Shanghai criteria) and liver transplantation ( 58 patients, including 26 cases meeting Shanghai criteria) in our hospital from January 2006 to January 2010. The median survival times and 1-, 2-, and 3- year survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan- Meier method, and the log- rank test was used for survival difference analysis. Results For all patients, the median survival times of the comprehensive treatment group and liver transplantation group were 18. 00 ± 1. 15 and 23. 40 ± 4. 44 months, respectively, and their 3- year survival rates were ( 18. 2 ± 3. 9) % and ( 39. 7 ±6.4) %, respectively; the survival was significantly improved by the treatment of liver transplantation ( P =0.009) . For patients meeting Shanghai criteria, the median survival times of the comprehensive treatment group and liver transplantation group were 20. 00 ± 1. 17 and 36. 00 ± 0. 00 months, respectively, and their 3- year survival rates were ( 25. 0 ± 6. 3) % and ( 57. 7 ± 9. 7) %, respectively; there was significant survival difference between the two groups ( P = 0. 008) . For patients exceeding Shanghai criteria, the median survival times of the comprehensive treatment group and liver transplantation group were 16. 00 ± 1. 78 and 16. 00 ± 1. 69 months, respectively, and their 3- year survival rates were ( 11. 8 ± 4. 5) % and ( 25. 0 ± 7. 7) %, respectively; there was no significant survival difference between the two groups ( P = 0. 221) . Conclusion Compared with comprehensive treatment, liver transplantation leads to a significant higher long- term survival rate in HCC patients exceeding Milan criteria but meeting Shanghai criteria. However, the two therapies cause no significant survival difference in HCC patients exceeding Shanghai criteria.

     

  • loading
  • [1]Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China.Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (V2011) [J].J Clin Hepatol, 2011, 27 (11) :1141-1159. (in Chinese) 中华人民共和国卫生部.原发性肝癌诊疗规范 (2011年版) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2011, 27 (11) :1141-1159.
    [2]SHEN F, XIA Y.A superficial view on clinical studies of comprehensive surgical management of liver cancer[J].J Surg Concepts Pract, 2010, 15 (3) :205-207. (in Chinese) 沈锋, 夏勇.肝癌外科综合治疗的临床研究之浅见[J].外科理论与实践, 2010, 15 (3) :205-207.
    [3] JEMAL A, BRAY F, CENTER MM, et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61 (2) :69-90.
    [4] FAN J, YANF GS, FU ZR, et al.Liver transplantation outcomes in1, 078 hepatocellular carcinoma patients:a multicenter experience in Shanghai, China[J].J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2009, 135 (10) :1403-1412.
    [5] McGLYNN KA, LONDON WT.The global epidemioloiry of hepatocellular carcinoma:present and future[J].Clin Liver Dis, 2011, 15 (2) :223-243.
    [6]National Comprehensive Cancer Network.Hepatobiliary Cancer Network[J].Hepatobiliary Cancers.www.org 2010, Vol.V.2.
    [7]POPESCU I, IONESCU M, CIUREA S, et al.Current treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.Analysis of a series of 123 cases over a 5-year period[J].Chirurgia (Bucur) , 2005, 100 (4) :321-331.
    [8] FAN J, ZHOU J, XU Y.Re-evaluation of“Shanghai Criteria”:indication of liver transplantation for hepatocelluar carcinoma[J].Chin J Organ Transplant, 2013, 34 (9) :521-523. (in Chinese) 樊嘉, 周俭, 徐泱.“上海标准”在肝癌肝移植适应症中应用13年的回顾分析[J].中华器官移植杂志, 2013, 34 (9) :521-523.
    [9]BAI W, HAN GH.Comprehensive intervention treatment for hepatocellular[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2013, 29 (1) :36-37. (in Chinese) 白苇, 韩国宏.肝细胞癌的综合介入治疗[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29 (1) :36-37.
    [10] CHEN MS, LI JQ, ZHENG Y, et al.A prospective randomized trial comparing pcrcutancous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatoccllular carcinoma[J].Ann Surg, 2006, 243 (3) :321-328.
    [11]LEE IJ, SEONG J.The optimal selection of radiotherapy treatment for hepatoccllular carcinoma[J].Cut Liver, 2012, 6 (2) :139-148.
    [12]KIM JY, CHUNH SM, CHOI BO, et al.Hepatoccllular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis:improved treatment outcomes with extenal beam radiation therapy[J].Hepatol Res, 2011, 41 (9) :813-824.
    [13] WU MC, ZHOU WP, PAN ZY.New challenges for surgical treatment of hepatocellar carcinoma[J].Infect Dis Info, 2012, 25 (5) :257-263. (in Chinese) 吴孟超, 周伟平, 潘泽亚.肝癌外科治疗新挑战[J].传染病信息, 2012, 25 (5) :257-263.引证本文:LIU JY, CAI QC, JIANG Y.Clinical effects of comprehensive treatment and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding Milan criteria:a comparative study[J].J Clin Hepatol, 2014, 30 (10) :913-916. (in Chinese) 刘建勇, 蔡秋程, 江艺.超出米兰标准的肝癌患者综合治疗和肝移植的疗效比较[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2014, 30 (10) :913-916.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3133) PDF downloads(491) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return