腹内压、C反应蛋白、降钙素原检测对妊娠晚期急性胰腺炎的预测价值

廖文彦; 杨春芬; 秦永喜; 贺军; 丁成明

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.08.024

腹内压、C反应蛋白、降钙素原检测对妊娠晚期急性胰腺炎的预测价值

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2019.08.024

南华大学附属第一医院

基金项目:

湖南省自然基金-青年基金项目(2018JJ3471)；湖南省卫计委项目(C20180156)；

详细信息

中图分类号: R714.255
计量
- 文章访问数: 1042
- HTML全文浏览量: 22
- PDF下载量: 232
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-11
- 出版日期: 2019-08-20

Clinical value of the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin in patients with acute pancreatitis in late pregnancy

The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University

Research funding:

摘要

摘要:
目的探讨检测腹内压（IAP）、C反应蛋白（CRP）、降钙素原（PCT）在妊娠晚期急性胰腺炎中的临床价值。方法选取2008年9月-2018年9月于南华大学附属第一医院妇产科和肝胆外科住院的妊娠晚期（28周以上）急性胰腺炎孕妇80例,其中轻症及中重症急性胰腺炎45例（对照组）,重症急性胰腺炎35例（观察组）。收集两组孕妇临床资料,包括IAP、CRP、PCT、胎儿窘迫、新生儿Apgar评分等。计量资料两组间比较采用t检验;计数资料两组间比较采用χ2检验。Pearson相关法检验CRP、PCT、IAP与胰腺炎严重程度,以及与胎儿不良结局（胎儿窘迫、出生时1 min Apgar评分）的相关性。根据受试者工作特征曲线（ROC曲线）计算各项指标诊断准确度最高的临界值,以及该值所对应的敏感度和特异度,评价各项指标对妊娠晚期急性胰腺炎的预判价值。结果观察组CRP[（185. 92±23. 59） mg/L vs （120. 92±20. 02） mg/L]、PCT[（12. 93±3. 16） ng/ml vs （5. 67±1. 65） ng/ml]、IAP[（12. 67±1. 40） mm Hg ...
- 胰腺炎 /
- 腹内高压 /
- C反应蛋白质 /
- 降钙素原
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical value of the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) , C-reactive protein (CRP) , and procalcitonin (PCT) in patients with acute pancreatitis in late pregnancy. Methods A total of 80 patients with acute pancreatitis in late pregnancy (≥28 gestational weeks) who were hospitalized in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University from September 2008 to September 2018 were enrolled, and among these patients, 45 with mild or moderately severe acute pancreatitis were enrolled as control group, and 35 with severe acute pancreatitis were enrolled as observation group. Related clinical data were collected, including IAP, CRP, PCT, fetal distress, and neonatal Apgar score. The t-test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation of CRP, PCT, and IAP with the severity of pancreatitis and poor fetal outcomes (fetal distress and neonatal Apgar score at 1 minute after birth) . The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal cut-off values of these indices for accurate diagnosis and corresponding sensitivity and specificity, in order to evaluate their value in predicting acute pancreatitis in late pregnancy. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly higher levels of CRP (185. 92 ± 23. 59 mg/L vs 120. 92 ± 20. 02 mg/L, t = 13. 318, P < 0. 001) , PCT (12. 93 ± 3. 16 ng/ml vs 5. 67 ± 1. 65 ng/ml, t = 12. 298, P < 0. 001) , and IAP (12. 67 ± 1. 40 mm Hg vs 5. 77 ± 1. 10 mm Hg, t =23. 858, P < 0. 001) . Compared with the observation group, the control group had a significantly lower incidence rate of fetal distress (6/45vs 15/35, χ2= 8. 864, P = 0. 003) and a significantly higher neonatal 1-minute Apgar score (8. 22 ± 0. 67 vs 5. 97 ± 0. 78, t =-13. 817, P < 0. 001) . The correlation analysis showed that IAP was positively correlated with CRP, PCT, and Ranson score for pancreatitis in late pregnancy (r = 0. 814, 0. 712, and 0. 788, all P < 0. 001) and was negatively correlated with neonatal 1-minute Apgar score (r =-0. 820, P < 0. 001) . CRP had an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0. 838 at the optimal cut-off value of 158. 32 mg/L, with a sensitivity of77. 1% and a specificity of 93. 3%; PCT had an AUC of 0. 853 at the optimal cut-off value of 10. 23 ng/L, with a sensitivity of 71. 4%and a specificity of 97. 8%; IAP had an AUC of 0. 903 at the optimal cut-off value of 10. 09 mm Hg, with a sensitivity of 82. 9% and a specificity of 95. 6%. Conclusion The measurement of IAP, CRP, and PCT has a good value in the early prediction of severe acute pancreatitis in pregnancy and can help to determine the severity of pancreatitis in late pregnancy and decide the timing of termination of pregnancy.
- pancreatitis /
- intra-abdominal hypertension /
- C-reactive protein /
- procalcitonin

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1] DUCARME G, MAIRE F, CHATEL P, et al. Acute pancreatitis during pregnancy:A review[J]. J Perinatol, 2014, 34 (2) :87-94.

[2] WEI XY. Analysis of clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis associated with pregnancy[D]. Zhengzhou:Zhengzhou University, 2017. (in Chinese) 魏晓艳.妊娠合并急性胰腺炎的临床特点分析[D].郑州:郑州大学, 2017.

[3] YUAN J, MENG F, TANG XW, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2019, 35 (1) :138-142. (in Chinese) 袁景, 孟飞, 汤小伟, 等.妊娠合并急性胰腺炎的临床特征与预后分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2019, 35 (1) :138-142.

[4] ZHAO HY, ZHANG Q, WU YZ. High risk factors and prognosis of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy[J]. J Med Postgraduates, 2015, 28 (1) :64-66. (in Chinese) 赵昊云, 张秦, 吴元赭.妊娠合并急性胰腺炎的高危因素及预后评估[J].医学研究生学报, 2015, 28 (1) :64-66.

[5] Group of Pancreas Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis (2014) [J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2015, 31 (1) :17-20. (in Chinese) 中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组.急性胰腺炎诊治指南 (2014) [J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2015, 31 (1) :17-20.

[6] CHUN R, BAGHIRZADA L, TIRUTA C, et al. Measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in term pregnancy:A pilot study[J]. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2012, 21 (2) :135-139.

[7] SUN JQ, ZHOU J, ZHENG RJ, et al. The diagnostic value of serum PCT, CRP, LPS for infected pancreatic necrosis in the late course of severe acute pancreatitis[J]. Zhejiang Clin Med J, 2017, 19 (6) :1130-1131. (in Chinese) 孙久庆, 周峻, 郑儒君, 等.血清PCT、CRP、LPS检测对SAP后期感染性胰腺坏死的诊断价值[J].浙江临床医学, 2017, 19 (6) :1130-1131.

[8] TAN C, LING Z, HUANG Y, et al. Dysbiosis of intestinal microbiota associated with inflammation involved in the progression of acute pancreatitis[J]. Pancreas, 2015, 44 (6) :868-875.

[9] LIU T, ZHAO G. The research progress of laboratory diagnosis for acute pancreatitis[J]. Clin J Med Offic, 2014, 42 (10) :1070-1072, 1075. (in Chinese) 刘婷, 赵冠.急性胰腺炎实验室诊断的研究进展[J].临床军医杂志, 2014, 42 (10) :1070-1072, 1075.

[10] LI XP, LI J. Clinical value of serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lipase in predicting severe acute pancreatitis during pregnancy[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2016, 32 (10) :1939-1942. (in Chinese) 黎先萍, 李娟.血清CRP、降钙素原及脂肪酶对妊娠合并重症急性胰腺炎的预判价值[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2016, 32 (10) :1939-1942.

[11] van BRUNSCHOT S, SCHUT AJ, BOUWENSE SA, et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis:A systematic review[J]. Pancreas, 2014, 43 (5) :665-674.

[12] WANG XY, LIU Z, PAN GD, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of23 severe acute pancreatitis patients with abdominal compartment syndrome[J]. J Chin Physician, 2014, 16 (3) :364-367. (in Chinese) 王晓源, 刘振, 潘光栋, 等.重症急性胰腺炎合并腹腔间隔室综合征23例诊治分析[J].中国医师杂志, 2014, 16 (3) :364-367.

[13] SUN L, LI W, SUN F, et al. Intra-abdominal pressure in third trimester pregnancy complicated by acute pancreatitis:An observational study[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2015, 15:223.

[14] YE XZ, YAO GF. Value of combined measurement of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A in the diagnosis of sepsis and their influence on prognosis[J]. Clin J Med Offic, 2017, 45 (11) :1191-1193. (in Chinese) 叶先智, 姚桂芬.降钙素原、C-反应蛋白、血清淀粉样蛋白A联合检测对脓毒血症诊断及其预后影响[J].临床军医杂志, 2017, 45 (11) :1191-1193.

[15] SUN CW, LI AJ, YANG ZG, et al. Association of serum levels of C-reactive protein and complement C3 with the prognosis of children with acute appendicitis[J]. Trauma Crit Med, 2018, 6 (3) :160-161, 163. (in Chinese) 孙传玮, 李爱军, 杨忠刚, 等.血清C反应蛋白及补体C3水平与急性阑尾炎患儿预后相关性[J].创伤与急危重病医学, 2018, 6 (3) :160-161, 163.

[16] ZHAO ZQ, XI Z, YAN PF. Clinical value of combined detection of amylase, lipase and procalcitonin in the diagnosis of children with acute pancreatitis[J]. Chin J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2017, 22 (11) :1265-1268. (in Chinese) 赵志强, 席錾, 闫鹏飞.血清脂肪酶、血清淀粉酶与血清降钙素原在儿童急性胰腺炎诊断中的意义[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2017, 22 (11) :1265-1268.

[17] MUNIGALA S, CONWELL DL, GELRUD A, et al. Heavy smoking is associated with lower age at first episode of acute pancreatitis and a higher risk of recurrence[J]. Pancreas, 2015, 44 (6) :876-881.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计