门静脉血栓对肝硬化患者预后的影响

汤雯; 王宇; 赵新颜; 王晓明; 欧晓娟; 贾继东

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.03.014

门静脉血栓对肝硬化患者预后的影响

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.03.014

1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院医疗保健中心内科
2. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院肝病中心

详细信息

中图分类号: R575.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 2374
- HTML全文浏览量: 51
- PDF下载量: 476
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 出版日期: 2017-03-20

Impact of portal vein thrombosis on prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis

Department of Internal Medicine, Health Care Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University

摘要

摘要: 目的通过前瞻性队列研究评估门静脉血栓（PVT）对于肝硬化患者预后的影响。方法对2013年6月-2014年6月于北京友谊医院肝病中心诊断为肝硬化并住院治疗的114例患者进行规律随访,根据是否合并PVT将肝硬化患者分为PVT组（n=22）及非PVT组（n=92）。对两组患者进行规律随访,终点事件包括静脉曲张破裂出血、难治性腹水、肝性脑病、肝病相关死亡。正态分布的计量资料两组间比较采用独立样本t检验,非正态分布的计量资料两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验,分类变量比较采用χ2检验及Fisher精确检验。危险因素分析采用单因素及多因素Cox回归分析。结果 PVT组失代偿事件（χ2=7.539,P=0.006）、静脉曲张破裂出血（χ2=5.390,P=0.020）以及难治性腹水（χ2=19.360,P<0.001）累积发生率均显著高于非PVT组;两组肝性脑病累积发生率比较,差异无统计学意义（χ2=2.006,P=0.157）。PVT是失代偿事件[风险比（HR）=12.9...
- 肝硬化 /
- 静脉血栓栓塞 /
- 预后
Abstract: Objective To investigate the impact of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) , a common complication of liver cirrhosis, on the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis via a prospective cohort study.Methods The patients who were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and hospitalized in Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, from June 2013 to June 2014 were enrolled.According to the presence or absence of PVT, they were divided into PVT group (22 patients) and non-PVT group (92 patients) .The patients were followed up regularly, and outcome events included variceal bleeding, refractory ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and liver disease-related death.The independent samples t-test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for comparison of categorical data.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to determine risk factors.Results Compared with the non-PVT group, the PVT group had significantly higher cumulative incidence rates of decompensation event (χ2=7.539, P=0.006) , variceal rupture and bleeding (χ2=5.390, P=0.02) , and intractable ascites (χ2=19.360, P<0.001) , while there was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy between the two groups (χ2=2.006, P=0.157) .PVT was an independent risk factor for decompensation event (HR=12.907, 95% CI:2.537-65.658, P=0.002) and intractable ascites (HR=27.055, 95% CI:3.191-229.414, P=0.002) .The PVT group had a lower cumulative survival rate than the non-PVT group (χ2=7.112, P=0.008) , while after the patients were stratified according to Child-Pugh class, there was no significant difference in cumulative survival rate between the two groups for patients with a Child-Pugh score of ≥10 (χ2=2.066, P=0.151) or the patients with Child-Pugh score of<10 (χ2=3.068, P=0.08) .Conclusion PVT is an independent risk factor for decompensation event and refractory ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis, but it is not an independent risk factor for death in patients with liver cirrhosis.
- liver cirrhosis /
- venous thromboembolism /
- prognosis

HTML全文

参考文献(10)

[1]FIMOGNARI FL, VIOLI F.Portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis[J].Intern Emerg Med, 2008, 3 (3) :213-218.

[2]KUMAR A, SHARMA P, ARORA A.Review article:portal vein obstruction-epidemiology, pathogenesis, natural history, prognosis and treatment[J].Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2015, 41 (3) :276-292.

[3]NERY F, CHEVRET S, CONDAT B, et al.Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1243 patients with cirrhosis:results of a longitudinal study[J].Hepatology, 2014, 61 (2) :660-667.

[4]D'AMICO G, de FRANCHIS R, COOPERATIVE STUDY G.Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis.Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators[J].Hepatology, 2003, 38 (3) :599-612.

[5]AMITRANO L, GUARDASCIONE MA, MANGUSO F, et al.The effectiveness of current acute variceal bleed treatments in unselected cirrhotic patients:refining short-term prognosis and risk factors[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2012, 107 (12) :1872-1878.

[6]MARUYAMA H, OKUGAWA H, TAKAHASHI M, et al.De novo portal vein thrombosis in virus-related cirrhosis:predictive factors and long-term outcomes[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2013, 108 (4) :568-574.

[7]BERRY K, TAYLOR J, LIOU IW, et al.Portal vein thrombosis is not associated with increased mortality among patients with cirrhosis[J].Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 13 (3) :585-593.

[8]QI X, DAI J, YANG M, et al.Association between portal vein thrombosis and survival in non-liver-transplant patients with liver cirrhosis:a systematic review of the literature[J].Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2015, 2015:480842.

[9]LUCA A, CARUSO S, MILAZZO M, et al.Natural course of extrahepatic nonmalignant partial portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis[J].Radiology, 2012, 265 (1) :124-132.

[10]GIRLEANU I, STANCIU C, COJOCARIU C, et al.Natural course o nonmalignant partial portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients[J].Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20 (5) :288-292.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计