内镜治疗与断流术治疗门静脉高压的效果比较

白兰; 郭晓钟; 李宏宇

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.12.012

内镜治疗与断流术治疗门静脉高压的效果比较

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2014.12.012

沈阳军区总医院消化内科

详细信息

中图分类号: R657.34
计量
- 文章访问数: 2558
- HTML全文浏览量: 13
- PDF下载量: 573
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-05-16
- 出版日期: 2014-12-20

Comparison of endoscopic variceal ligation and pericardial devascularization in treatment of portal hypertension

Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area

摘要

摘要:
目的比较内镜治疗与断流术对门静脉高压的治疗效果。方法收集2010年1月-2012年1月沈阳军区总医院101例肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血患者的临床资料,其中内镜下联合治疗53例（内镜组）,断流术治疗48例（断流术组）,比较两组患者肝功能、脾亢变化以及术后再出血率和并发症情况。计量资料采用均数±标准差（x±s）表示,计数资料采用例数或百分率表示,两组间比较计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用χ2检验。结果内镜组术后肝脏储备功能较术前变化不明显（P值均>0.05）;断流术组术后白蛋白水平与术前比较下降,差异均有统计学意义（t=2.512,P<0.05）;内镜组术后白细胞、血小板与术前相比变化不明显（p值均>0.05）,断流术组术后白细胞、血小板与术前相比升高,差异均有统计学意义（P值均<0.05）;两组术后累计再出血率比较3个月7.5%和6.2%（χ2=0.066,p>0.05）,6个月7.5%和8.3%（χ2=0.021,P>0.05）及1年9.4%和8.3%（χ2=0.038,P>0.05）;两组术后并发症发生率分别为24.5%和50%,差异...
- 食管和胃静脉曲张 /
- 高血压,门静脉 /
- 肝硬化 /
- 治疗
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus pericardial devascularization in the treatment of portal hypertension. Methods The clinical data of 101 cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage from January2010 to January 2012 were analyzed. Fifty-three patients received endoscopic variceal ligation, and forty-eight patients received pericardial devascularization. Postoperative changes in liver function and hypersplenism were compared between the two groups. The rate of rehaemorrhagia and incidence of postoperative complications after surgery were compared as well. Continuous data were expressed as mean ± SD, and categorical data were expressed as number of cases or percentage. Comparison of continuous data between the two groups was made by independent-samples t test, and comparison of categorical data was made by chi-square test. Results After surgery, the variceal ligation group showed no significant changes in liver reserve function, while the albumin level was significantly decreased in the pericardial devascularization group (t =2. 512, P < 0. 05) . There were no significant changes in the counts of white blood cells and platelets in the endoscopic variceal ligation group after surgery (P > 0. 05) , but significant increases in the counts of white blood cells and platelets were detected in the pericardial devascularization group (P < 0. 05) . The rates of postoperative haemorrhage in the two groups were: 3 months, 7. 5% vs 6. 2% (χ2= 0. 066, P > 0. 05) , 6 months, 7. 5% vs 8. 3% (χ2= 0. 021, P > 0. 05) , and 1 year, 9. 4% vs 8. 3% (χ2= 0. 038, P > 0. 05) . The incidence rates of postoperative complications in the two groups were 24. 5% and 50%, respectively (χ2= 7. 040, P < 0. 05) . Conclusion Compared with pericardial devascularization, endoscopic variceal ligation causes fewer microlesions, preserves liver function, and leads to a lower incidence of postoperative complications. However, if hypersplenism is observed in the cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage, pericardial devascularization can be used to control the hypersplenism and prevent esophageal hemorrhage.
- esophageal and gastric varices /
- hypertension, portal /
- liver cirrhosis /
- treatment

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

[1]LIN XX, LIN CJ, LI J, et al.Value of liver reserve function in evaluation of hemorrbage risk and prognosis of cirrhosis with esophogeal varices bleeding[J].J Med Res, 2014, 43 (1) :84-88. (in Chinese) 林晓晓, 林春景, 李佳, 等.肝储备功能对肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血风险及预后的评估价值[J].医学研究杂志, 2014, 43 (1) :84-88.

[2]LI ZW, ZHANG PR, ZHANG SK.Disputes in devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2013, 12 (11) :823-826. (in Chinese) 李志伟, 张培瑞, 张绍康.门静脉高压症断流术的争议[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12 (11) :823-826.

[3]CASELITZ M, MASCHE N, FLEMMING P, et al.Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma according to new staging classifications[J].Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2004, 129 (33) :1725-1730.

[4]RODRIGUEZ-PEREZ F, GROSZMANN RJ.Pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension[J].Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2002, 21 (1) :15-40.

[5]XU JF, YIN YF, LUO SQ.The history and future of Sugiura operation[J].Chin J Hepatol, 2013, 21 (4) :245-248. (in Chinese) 许继凡, 殷永芳, 罗诗樵.经胸和经腹门奇静脉断流术的历史地位及未来[J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2013, 21 (4) :245-248.

[6]GARCIA-TSAO G, SANYAL AJ, GRACE ND, et al.Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varicesand variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis[J].Am J Gastroenterol, 2007, 102 (9) :2086-2102.

[7]LIN W, LIU XJ, JIANG GJ, et al.Comparison among endoscopic variceal slerotheropy, endoscopic variceal slerotheropy with sequentia I endoscopic variceal ligation plus endoscopic variceal slerotheropy, and endoscopic variceal ligation plus endoscopic vanceal slerotheropy for esophageal varicosis[J].World Chin J Dig, 2007, 15 (9) :1020-1023. (in Chinese) 蔺武, 刘心娟, 姜国俊, 等.EVS、EVS+EVL续贯EVS和EVL续贯EVS治疗食管静脉曲张的疗效比较[J].世界华人消化杂志, 2007, 15 (9) :1020-1023.

[8]LI BM, ZHU X, SHU X, et al.Endoscopic variceal ligation plus sclerotherapy for esophageal variceal bleeding[J].Chin J Dig Endosc, 2013, 30 (2) :67-70. (in Chinese) 李弼民, 朱萱, 舒徐, 等.肝硬化食管静脉曲张破裂出血序贯治疗的临床应用价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志, 2013, 30 (2) :67-70.

[9]LYU Y, LI MX, LIU XM, et al.Risk factors for recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage after splenectomy plus periardial devascularization for patients with portal hypertension[J].Chin J Dig Surg, 2013, 12 (11) :827-831. (in Chinese) 吕毅, 李慕行, 刘学民, 等.门静脉高压症脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后消化道再出血的危险因素分析[J].中华消化外科杂志, 2013, 12 (11) :827-831.

[10]SUN Q, ZHENG Z.Comparision of efficacy of emergency operation versus selective operation for massive upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to portal hyperension[J].J Clin Surg, 2013, 21 (6) :439-440. (in Chinese) 孙强, 郑正.急诊与择期手术治疗门静脉高压症上消化道大出血的比较[J].临床外科杂志, 2013, 21 (6) :439-440.

[11]LIU C, XU J, JI YC, et al.A comparative study between handassisted laparoscopic splenectomy and open splenectomy in combination with pericardial devascularization to treat portal hypertension[J].Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2011, 17 (4) :285-288. (in Chinese) 刘昶, 许军, 纪艳超, 等.手助腹腔镜与开腹脾切除、贲门周围血管离断术的临床分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志, 2011, 17 (4) :285-288.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计