PDF下载 ( 1161 KB)
Clinical characteristics to identify the etiological diagnosis of hepatic injury in patients with alanine aminotransferase activities over 15 times the upper reference limit
-
摘要:
目的通过分析ALT大于15倍正常值上限(15×ULN)肝损伤患者临床特征、ALT变化情况及肝炎血清标志物检测结果,探讨ALT大于15×ULN肝损伤病因诊断。方法检测70例ALT大于15×ULN肝损伤患者肝炎血清标志物、ALT、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、总胆红素(TBil)峰值,分析肝炎血清标志物构成、ALT动态变化,比较不同类型肝炎实验室指标。结果检出单一肝炎血清标志物阳性者52例,占74.3%;2种阳性者4例,占5.7%;未检出者14例,占20.0%。不同类型肝炎实验室指标差异无统计学意义。ALT水平随入院时间延长呈对数线性下降,戊型肝炎下降更为明显。结论血清肝炎标志物结合ALT动态变化可以指导ALT大于15×ULN肝损伤病因分析,作为临床诊断重要参考依据。
Abstract:Objective To investigate distinguishing clinical features that may be useful for etiological diagnosis of hepatic injury, including changes in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and immunological markers of viral infection. Methods Seventy patients with initial baseline ALT that was greater than 15 times the upper limit of normal (15×ULN) were recruited to the study between January 2011 and December 2011.Hepatic function markers (bilirubin, ALT, prothrombin time, and alkaline phosphatase) were measured by standard biochemical assays and immunological markers of hepatitis virus [hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HEV and HBV DNA] were examined by immunoassays and quantitative PCR.Changes in ALT over several weeks were statistically analyzed for correlation with laboratory data. Results Among the inpatient study participants, 74.3% reacted with a single antibody, 5.7% reacted with two kinds of antibodies, and 20.0% reacted with no antibodies.There was no remarkable difference in laboratory data for these groups.However, ALT decreased in a logarithmic-linear manner in conjunction with the development of illness.In HEV-infected patients, the ALT levels decreased more rapidly. Conclusion Immunological markers of viral infection and changes in ALT can facilitate etiological diagnosis of patients with hepatic injury that present with 15 × ULN of ALT.
-
Key words:
- alanine transaminase /
- live diseases
-
[1]谈逸云, 申惠国, 黄燕, 等.不同型别急性肝炎临床特征比较[J].中国临床医学, 2008, 15 (3) :374-376. [2]刘万里, 薛茜, 曹明芹, 等.用SPSS实现完全随机设计多组比较秩和检验的多重比较[J].地方病通报, 2007, 22 (2) :27-29. [3]Dufour DR, Lott JA, Nolte FS, et al.Diagnosis and monito-ring of hepatic injury.II.Recommendations for use of labora-tory tests in screening, diagnosis, and monitoring[J].ClinChem, 2000, 46 (12) :2050-2068. [4]张占卿, 董华娟, 黄绍萍, 等.血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶和门冬氨酸氨基转移酶对急性与慢性乙型肝炎的鉴别意义[J].实用肝脏病杂志, 2005, 8 (1) :34-35. [5] 中华医学会肝病学分会, 中华医学会消化病学分会.常用肝脏生物化学试验的临床意义及评价共识[J].中华消化杂志, 2010, 30 (5) :331-340. [6]王娜, 郑英杰, 姜庆五, 等.急性肝炎患者系列血清分型及发病特征研究[J].疾病控制杂志, 2005, 9 (6) :533-537. [7]Rozen P, Korn RJ, Zimmerman HJ.Computer analysis of liv-er function tests and their interrelationship in 347 cases of vi-ral hepatitis[J].Isr J Med Sci, 1970, 6:67-79. [8]王绮夏, 邱德凯, 马雄.2010年美国肝病学会自身免疫性肝炎指南解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志 (电子版) , 2011, 3 (1) :8-13. [9]周鸿良, 陈小静, 杨丽俊, 等.HBc-IgM检测在乙肝鉴别诊断中的意义[J].放射免疫学杂志, 2010, 23 (2) :235-236. [10]夏邦世, 沈忠海, 朱金明, 等.低滴度抗-HBc IgM测定在慢性乙型肝炎病变判断中的价值[J].中华传染病杂志, 2006, 24 (3) :204-205. [11]周镇先, 耿全林.国产抗HBc IgM试剂现况分析[J].临床检验杂志, 2005, 23 (5) :378. [12]孙静媛, 田庚善, 孙凤霞.乙型肝炎患者血清中抗HBc-IgM的临床意义[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2006, 22 (1) :31-32. [13]张义红, 刘琼, 陈海波, 等.急性乙型肝炎和慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染急性发作临床诊断的鉴别指标[J].中国医药, 2008, 3 (4) :204-205. [14]赵鸿, 田庚善.急性乙型肝炎和慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染急性发作鉴别诊断的临床研究[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2004, 18 (4) :363-365. [15]谢雯, 刘庄.病毒性肝炎的临床现状[J].中国临床医生, 2004, 32 (12) :4-6. [16]Lok AS, McMahon BJ.Chronic Hepatitis B:Update 2009.AASLDPractice Guidelines[J].Hepatology, 2009, 50 (3) :661-662. [17]邴桂梅.急性乙型肝炎和慢性乙型肝炎急性发作的比较[J].当代医学, 2011, 17 (16) :96-97. -
本文二维码
计量
- 文章访问数: 2767
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 604
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
